(I did not see another thread regarding this particular topic so apologizes if this is duplicated)
With so many X-men titles including solo titles I find it interesting to find out why certain titles appeal to fans. I have noticed as I have collected titles for a double digit years (not including a 5 years break) my reasoning and tastes have absolutely changed. I have also known that there is quite a divisive nature to the titles currently with fans typically falling on the dubbed "Blue" and "Gold" sides of the X-men, which I find I also fall into. This is to find out why others follow or read (I do not want to use the work collect as it is not wholly accurate as many I do not collect myself but I read on Marvel U or follow on boards such as this). It may enlighten myself on titles I am overlooking (and may do the same for other readers).
Here is my rundown and reasoning starting with what I follow:
All New X-men: Honestly, I follow it for the art. Immonen is a master (IMO). I enjoyed the book in the beginning but it has been moving at a snails pace and I find the writing to be only decent, although Bendis, for all of his faults, is a great dialogue writer. I do appreciate there is a consistent voice from issue to issue and the characters (O5) are pretty insulated within the title itself barring "events". I do not think this will have a long -term effect on present day X-men and I have a fondness for the original five (although they are short one now). I will stop following the title most likely if Immonen leaves (unless Pichelli takes over).
Uncanny: I am a fan of Cyclops and Magik. I like the characters. Again though, I follow it for Bachalo, but even I admit that his technique seems to be getting sloppy in the last few issues, the current issue was bad. Of all the X-titles I find this one to hold most true to the original concept of the X-men. Seeking out new mutants, fighting against prejudice and danger, and trying to be accepted by mutants and humans alike. I also enjoy the attempt at redemption Cyclops and Magik seem to be attempting (Emma DGAF).
X-men: Loved the concept and the characters included. Psylocke, Rachel, Jubilee...yes please. Good start to the series but I do not feel it has lived up to the expectations at all. Hoping for the best from the Guggenheim arc but I feel the title may not be long in the tooth or restarted after this, which is why I am holding on.
X-force: Great characters for the most part. More than half the team only represented in this title. Superior writer. Art was a turn-off, great fill-in artist. Sounds as if Kim may have been getting his feel for the title though so I am hoping the art upon his return does not detract from the story.
Cyclops: Unique setting in the X-verse currently, and the Starjammers. The writer is great, the art is above standard. I am a fan of Cyclops. Probably one of the best first issues I have read in a long while.
Magneto: Good concept. Interesting to follow Magneto's story and path. Walta has a different style than in his last Astonishing run and it fits the title better.
Uncanny AvengersOnly included as it does have some X-men), I think Remender is one of the better planners I the business today, although he does not always stick the landing, and his long-form way of writing can get a little tedious. I followed the title up to 12 but it felt to me it would read better once the whole Apocalypse Twins 20+ issue story was completed. I will pick up the trades from here on out. He wiped out Wonder Man (one of my favorite characters) and it does not appear he will be returning along with SW and Rogue, but a plus is that Wolverine should disappear during his temporary death.
Titles not currently read or followed (I did give them all a shot, not just discounting their worth because they mostly happen to be part of Wolverine's X-men).
Wolverine and the X-men: I do not care for the characters in the book. The students are not of interest, starting with yet another future-timeline story when so many titles have rotating time-based stories seemed like a poor choice. Every "teacher" in the title has at least one other title they are featured in. Art is ok. First issue was enough for me.
Amazing X-men: I like some characters in the title but the "meh" factor of the cast made me drop the title, I can get my Iceman fix with ANXM. Art was fine, story was ok but it seems redundant with WATX. Personally I have little interest in Storm, Wolverine, Beast in the current divided state of the X-men.
Wolverine: The restart is what it is, leads to his death (odd way to promote a new series). Read the first issue, didn't care for the concept and knew he was not "turning evil", plus it did not match up time-wise to any other title on the stands.
All New X-factor: I know I am going to regret not reading this one. I waited until the last X-factor volume was almost done to read the first few on Marvel Unlimited and then did a weekend binge on all the issues. Great writer, the art did not grab me and the character choices are what made me forgo the title at this point. I will try the first trade and see if it is worth following monthly for me.
Nightcrawler: I like NC, just not near enough to follow in a monthly, especially when Marvel did not have enough faith in the title to give it more than a six-issue start but market it as an "ongoing". They should have kept his story in Amazing to give the title a real focus.
Storm: ZERO interest. Don't care for her in the current age, the writer has done nothing to sell the concept (IMO), and I like the character design by the artist but I am familiar with his interiors and do not care for his panel to panel work.
I did not start the thread to cause fighting or defense on why people read certain titles so please do not use this as an excuse to flame the most polarizing 3 characters (Cyclops, Wolverine, Storm) or to attack fellow posters.
This is not an appreciation thread so all should be welcome to share why they enjoy or what they do not and be respected which seems to be an issue with some of the character specific threads.
Thank you for responding and thought sharing if you choose to do so.