This has been all kinds of pathetic so far and is just the type of thing I expected from Geoff "if it isn't an event, I'm not interested" Johns and company.
This has been all kinds of pathetic so far and is just the type of thing I expected from Geoff "if it isn't an event, I'm not interested" Johns and company.
I wouldn't be surprised if we see Cat again, it will be in the Supergirl book should it be revived for synergy's sake.
Maybe Cat hires the now fired Jimmy and Kara to work for her blog?
Dude, you're just throwing random ideas because you don't want it to be Lois. It's her, she said it herself. Twice. All there's left to tell is why.
I mean, why would she pretend to have discovered what Cat did? Why would Cat let anyone take credit for what she did?
Hold those chains, Clark Kent
Bear the weight on your shoulders
Stand firm. Take the pain.
I meant using Cat Grant to do it would be a better choice than Lois. Having Lois do it violates what the character is. Every other version of the character that knew the secret kept it, because that is the right thing to do. I understand that some changes are going to be made, but when you do something that outrageous, its not Lois Lane anymore.
Sigh....fortheloveof...
Look, this conversation happened a billion times already. We don't know what happened or why, except for hints that there's more to it than we know off. And, frankly, until we do hear her side of the story, this conversation is boring and pointless. I'll pass judgement on it when I'll will see the full picture (as it's obvious they're waiting to tell us for a reason), and frankly, I don't really care whether or not you'll do the same. So let's not pursue this any further,agreed?
Hold those chains, Clark Kent
Bear the weight on your shoulders
Stand firm. Take the pain.
.I have the same worry, but I do think there are legit reasons she could have outed Clark. So far, especially with this issue, the dialog indicates that for whatever reason she did it, it seems Diana is understanding of it, and on some level, even Clark himself is understanding of why. So, until we are shown otherwise in the next three issues of SUPERMAN , I have to think it was a pretty legitimate reasoning. Of course we won't know for sure for at least two weeks, if not a bit longer.
So, here's a crazy thought...why not read the story first before automatically deeming that DC Comics Character assassinated Lois?
I was expecting something like Simone's Batgirl which imo perfectly epitomized all the "grimdarkness" a lot people still associated with N52 but I gotta say, I surprising enjoyed this overall especially Lex not buying that Superman would be "just another loser" for his secret identity.
Wow, Lois came off terribly in this. You don't ruin someone's life like she did then act so defensively and antagonizing against the person who is suffering so much because of you. That is just horrible characterization. They are going to have to do some serious character work to dig her out of this hole they are putting her in. Though you have to wonder why they put her in this hole in the first place.
I think Superman/Wonder Woman is awful, dull and shouldn't have happened because of how it ruins WW's love interests in comparison, but if this Lois is Superman's other option at the moment then WW is looking a lot more appealing in my eyes.
Anyway, I was just really taken back by how bad Lois came off in this. Though is this new Superman coming off a lot like Wolverine to anyone else? Him riding a motorcycle, brawling and then some of those 8 page previews where he is fighting ninjas felt really Wolverine-esque.
If DC hadn't spent the past few years systematically trying to get rid of Lois and her importance to the Superman mythos I would give it more of a chance. Its clear that DC does not learn from their mistakes under the current regime.
That is why DC is doing this, to promote WW over Lois.
They are promoting WW by having her agreeing with Lois??