Page 220 of 267 FirstFirst ... 120170210216217218219220221222223224230 ... LastLast
Results 3,286 to 3,300 of 3996
  1. #3286
    Astonishing Member phantom1592's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    3,748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MajorHoy View Post
    If Alfred didn't come on to the scene until after Bruce became Batman, then he couldn't have acted in the "father role" in terms of raising young Bruce as a boy.

    HOWEVER, he doesn't have to be "some emotionally distant butler" either because shortly after entering the lives of Bruce and Dick, he stumbled upon their secret identities and thus became a helper in their battle against crime.
    My favorite version of Alfred


  2. #3287
    Ultimate Member Jackalope89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    10,421

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phantom1592 View Post
    My favorite version of Alfred

    What's more, that Batman wasn't a vigilante, but actually was deputized.

  3. #3288
    Uncanny Member MajorHoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    29,974

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jackalope89 View Post
    What's more, that Batman wasn't a vigilante, but actually was deputized.
    I think 1950s/1960s Batman in the comic books was more along those lines as well.

  4. #3289
    Astonishing Member phantom1592's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    3,748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MajorHoy View Post
    I think 1950s/1960s Batman in the comic books was more along those lines as well.
    I've long said that Adam West was the most Comic Accurate Batman ever.

    Whether we're talking about colorful goofy campy comic books of the 50's-60's..... Or we're talking about the all powerful Bat-God who can beat anyone, anytime with preperation that defies reality. He was prepared for any situation. Seriously... The guy had Shark Repellant... in an Aerosol can... on a HELICOPTER.

    Superman would be no problem for THAT Batman

  5. #3290
    Ultimate Member Jackalope89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    10,421

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phantom1592 View Post
    I've long said that Adam West was the most Comic Accurate Batman ever.

    Whether we're talking about colorful goofy campy comic books of the 50's-60's..... Or we're talking about the all powerful Bat-God who can beat anyone, anytime with preperation that defies reality. He was prepared for any situation. Seriously... The guy had Shark Repellant... in an Aerosol can... on a HELICOPTER.

    Superman would be no problem for THAT Batman
    Except that Batman would be good friends with Superman, and it would make far more sense than the more sociopathic one we get in modern times.

  6. #3291
    Ultimate Member marhawkman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    11,094

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jackalope89 View Post
    Except that Batman would be good friends with Superman, and it would make far more sense than the more sociopathic one we get in modern times.
    Well, yes, there is that old saying about the "best way to defeat an enemy"... yeah the twist is that you convince them to help you. So... the Adam West Batman defeated Superman before meeting him.

  7. #3292
    Amazing Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2021
    Posts
    91

    Default

    The Dark Knight Trilogy is not realistic Joker the movie is more
    my dream movie is a DC Black Label/Vertigo Batman movie

  8. #3293
    Extraordinary Member Restingvoice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    9,574

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JediBatman54 View Post
    The Dark Knight Trilogy is not realistic Joker the movie is more
    my dream movie is a DC Black Label/Vertigo Batman movie
    It was said to be realistic because at that time the only point of comparison is Burton and Schumacher's Batman (and their point of comparison was Batman 66)

  9. #3294
    Extraordinary Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    9,371

    Default

    Making Duke the by far least experienced member of the Batfamily, the only member that is allowed to fight crime by day, especially during a time when the police is trying to hunt down the Batfamily makes no sense.

  10. #3295
    Astonishing Member Tzigone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    3,748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheRay View Post
    Yeah, I'm going to need you to give some context here. Like what, you're saying he's only good as some emotionally distant butler?
    He was never "emotionally distant" - he was Bruce and Dick's friend. He was a member of the family, pretty quickly. But he wasn't the parent. Bruce didn't have that emotionally-unhealthy dependence on him. He didn't have the unhealthy devotion to Bruce. Bruce was emotionally healthy. Bruce took on the role of raising a (to be fair, fairly grown) child, without expectation of Alfred doing the heavy lifting (far less selfish), and did a good job of it and related well to Dick. Alfred had an independent relationship with Dick (whereas now, Alfred's relationships with the "kids" are far to often to subordinate to his relationship with Bruce, and he will even sacrifice their emotional well-being to Bruce's emotional needs, as with the amnesia and how he was with Damian, etc.). And Dick, not Alfred, was the closest person to Bruce back then. He's lost a lot, and as a fan of old-school Dick Grayson, I don't really care for that. A shifting as he grew and others took precendence in each other's lives would be totally natural (and I'd say was, in the early 1980s, though I found it forced in the early 70s), but he's been retconned to having always been second-tier (along with losing maturity, skills, respect of his peers, etc., but those have nothing do with Alfred).

    But my primary issue is how emotionally unhealthy Bruce has become. And time-correlated with Alfred as the parent, even if not caused by that. But when you put in a narrative context, it's a bad look for Alfred. And, even worse, I find their interpersonal dynamic to be unhealthy. With Alfred's life solely devoted to Bruce (made worse by his neglect of his own daughter). Bad enough in a parent, worse in someone still in a servant/employee role.

    I also didn't mind Bruce having relatives (Aunt Agatha, Uncle Silas, cousin Jane) that he got along, loved even. That losing his parents hurt, of course, but it motivated him, not consumed him. That he grieved, but his life was not forever-dark afterwards.
    Last edited by Tzigone; 11-13-2021 at 05:44 PM.

  11. #3296
    Ultimate Member Gaius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Occupied Klendathu
    Posts
    13,005

    Default

    Dick Grayson should have died in Infinite Crisis.

  12. #3297
    Better than YOU! Alan2099's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    7,501

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tzigone View Post
    He was never "emotionally distant" - he was Bruce and Dick's friend. He was a member of the family, pretty quickly. But he wasn't the parent. Bruce didn't have that emotionally-unhealthy dependence on him. He didn't have the unhealthy devotion to Bruce. Bruce was emotionally healthy. Bruce took on the role of raising a (to be fair, fairly grown) child, without expectation of Alfred doing the heavy lifting (far less selfish), and did a good job of it and related well to Dick. Alfred had an independent relationship with Dick (whereas now, Alfred's relationships with the "kids" are far to often to subordinate to his relationship with Bruce, and he will even sacrifice their emotional well-being to Bruce's emotional needs, as with the amnesia and how he was with Damian, etc.). And Dick, not Alfred, was the closest person to Bruce back then. He's lost a lot, and as a fan of old-school Dick Grayson, I don't really care for that. A shifting as he grew and others took precendence in each other's lives would be totally natural (and I'd say was, in the early 1980s, though I found it forced in the early 70s), but he's been retconned to having always been second-tier (along with losing maturity, skills, respect of his peers, etc., but those have nothing do with Alfred).

    But my primary issue is how emotionally unhealthy Bruce has become. And time-correlated with Alfred as the parent, even if not caused by that. But when you put in a narrative context, it's a bad look for Alfred. And, even worse, I find their interpersonal dynamic to be unhealthy. With Alfred's life solely devoted to Bruce (made worse by his neglect of his own daughter). Bad enough in a parent, worse in someone still in a servant/employee role.

    I also didn't mind Bruce having relatives (Aunt Agatha, Uncle Silas, cousin Jane) that he got along, loved even. That losing his parents hurt, of course, but it motivated him, not consumed him. That he grieved, but his life was not forever-dark afterwards.
    I too miss when Batman was a functional human being capable of actually showing emotion, or at least emotions other than sadness and anger.

    They keep piling dark on top of dark and removing the lighter elements of Batman and it makes for a weaker less interesting mythos not to mention a totally worse main character.

  13. #3298
    Ultimate Member marhawkman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    11,094

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alan2099 View Post
    I too miss when Batman was a functional human being capable of actually showing emotion, or at least emotions other than sadness and anger.

    They keep piling dark on top of dark and removing the lighter elements of Batman and it makes for a weaker less interesting mythos not to mention a totally worse main character.
    Best example was Bat-Blackrock! Superman actually talks Blackrock into leaving Batman as a host by talking to Blackrock about how deranged Batman is! The hilarious part? Blackrock was reading Batman's mind the whole time and verifying everything Superman said was true.

  14. #3299
    Astonishing Member Pohzee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    tOSU
    Posts
    3,073

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaius View Post
    Dick Grayson should have died in Infinite Crisis.
    If we were to base it solely on his runs as Nightwing and with the Titans, I'd have a hard time disagreeing with you there. They don't really seem to know where to take the character that isn't Batman-lite, even Robin-lite. But his stints and Batman and Agent of Spyral were fantasic, and demonstrate the potential he has that makes him worth keeping around IMO.
    It's the Dynamic Duo! Batman and Robin!... and Red Robin and Red Hood and Nightwing and Batwoman and Batgirl and Orphan and Spoiler and Bluebird and Lark and Gotham Girl and Talon and Batwing and Huntress and Azreal and Flamebird and Batcow?

    Since when could just anybody do what we trained to do? It makes it all dumb instead of special. Like it doesn't matter anymore.
    -Dick Grayson (Batman Inc.)


  15. #3300

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alan2099 View Post
    I too miss when Batman was a functional human being capable of actually showing emotion, or at least emotions other than sadness and anger.

    They keep piling dark on top of dark and removing the lighter elements of Batman and it makes for a weaker less interesting mythos not to mention a totally worse main character.
    My controversial opinion is Bruce's darkness and supposed lack of emotion are greatly exaggerated, it's almost like if a character isn't walking around quipping with a Joker-like permagrin on their face 24/7 it's "why don't they lighten up?"

    Not acting like a 90s Jim Carrey comedy character doesn't mean you're a suicidal mope.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •