Nevermind. Misread.
I think it's always been in-universe that Robin was awesome. Admittedly it was Dick Grayson... the sidekick who was inspirational enough that all the young heroes look to him as a defacto leader. In the real world Robin was more popular than Batman and showing up in more adventures than he was... because he was the character that kids could relate to and wished they were... no reason that couldn't bleed over into the DC universe too. Robin's the kid with no powers but still leads the titans and is partner to Batman...
Admittedly just like the real world... the name 'Robin' carries so much history and power, that I don't think anyone really cares WHO is wearing the mask... but if they're Robin than they must have ths stuff.
well that's not what your 1st post was about. Robin is at the TT's tower then. Does that help? he has 2 homes and you can read and see him there so I don't see what the problem is.
I mean Cass is also living at Wayne manor and is working in Gotham but we don't see her at least we know where Robin is.
Dc doesn't have a Batman and Robin Brand. They Have The Batman Brand and they have The Robin Brand.
They are separate. Damian and Dick were the 1st time we had that book.
Last edited by CPSparkles; 01-08-2020 at 02:13 AM.
Question is what are sidekicks in the DC universe? In a sense what is the way, Dick would be with his sidekick than Bruce? Are sidekicks just mentees or something else? Plus any names for his sidekicks? If they were his kids. I feel that should come later now the line
Jason Todd evolved better as individual character than Dick ever did. I donīt like Dick starring a solo, I think he fits better in teams
Sidekicks are apprentices and field assistants.
Bruce acts differently to his sidekicks depend on the era.
In Golden Age, he acts as a combination of big brother, father, uncle and mentor, very casual and having fun
In the modern era where things are more realistic, he demands perfection because if they're not good they're dead, and he says upfront that he won't be a father only to get emotionally attached anyway.
The big difference between Dick and Bruce I think is Bruce demands his apprentices to follow his rule to the letter but Dick doesn't demand change. He gives them time to be themselves and grow at their own pace.
Damian didn't respect him at first because he thinks he's a poor replacement, but once he went off on his own and fail to save someone, he realized that he's still incapable, and when Dick still rescued and believe in him, he started to respect him.
He's also able to read what his charges are thinking and give them an alternative.
Like with Ravager, he knows she's taught to be an assassin, and he doesn't demand her to instantly change or pretend she's not a killer, but he provides an alternative to settle disputes that don't involve killing people, and give a good reason for it that she can believe, such as "we need them alive so we can interrogate them or lead us to their boss"
Bruce is more hammer and nail.
"You fail to win against 100 gangsters, Helena, even though I give that task because I believe you could, so you're not in" and they have to prove things in a different way to gain his approval. Batman finally complimented Helena when she managed to give him a list of all the mob in Gotham, which is beyond what he asked or care for her.
With Stephanie, it's "one mistake and you're out"
I've heard otherwise. Especially back in the golden age when he was promoted in everything from Batman, Detective, World's finest, and Star Spangled Comics. Popularity is a fleeting thing and depends from person to person... but obviously DC saw him as a cash cow and kids responded to him.