Ok so call me crazy or a nay sayer but I don't think I get this angle they're taking with him being older. Mind you I'm not opposed to the idea of an older Batman. Not saying that at all. I'm into that. But the reasoning sound a little off to me given the world they live in.
Let me explain, if MOS' Superman is the first abnormal/supernatural event that the world has ever had on that level. If Superman is roughly the first public super being on this level or any other then how is Batman's veteran status gonna help?
Simply because he's old and has been beating on mobs bosses and poor thugs for 20 years with the occasional crazy person thrown in......how does that prep him AT ALL for god-man-laser-vision-dude? Being able to take a group of 30 guys down isn't going to help you fight a guy who can do and 8th of what Superman can do in MOS.
Simply because an old man fought in wars all his life isn't gonna help him fight an invincible god. What does this veteran status really mean? Batman learning about Superman for the first time ever at age 30 is roughly the same as him learning about him at age 40 something. There are no others before Superman to give Batman that seasoned status.
It's just a little odd to me. Like them trying to force DKR without the idea of them already knowing each other for years and years.
Yeah I'd agree that god-man fighting guy in Bat suit who hasn't been in a fight on this level against such a being beats wins. If they're going to say that he learns from watching Superman during and after the Zod stuff then I'll ask.....why, again, does he need to be old and "seasoned" to do this? Couldn't 30 something Batman do just the same if he watching Superman from that point on? Yeah I'd say so.
I'm more than fine with him being old. I'm actually looking forward to that idea but the reasoning makes no sense to me.
Aside from what LoneNecromancer said, it helps for the non-comicbook fan, who are used to Batman being played by different characters, not to be confused by a young Batman running around.
At this point, I'm trusting the script to give us a good explanation. I watched Argo again a few days ago and am hopeful that Chris Terrio can bring the same excitement and drama (and humor) to this film.
I thought the climax to Jedi was better to be honest. You had three groups with three separate goals, but the goals conflicted with each other to add drama. The Shields needed to be shut or Lando would be hanging out there with a target on his back unable to attack the Death Star. Luke needed to finish his personal conflict with Vader and the Emperor before any of that happened or he's dead. It left a feeling of uncertainty.
Multiple villains are often the opposite phenomenon where it's the same plot but you added to many distinct narratives to the same thread and did it in such a messy manner that it becomes convoluted and everything loses meaning. See Spider-Man 3. All the points built up to the same end, but they were all diminished because they were sharing time. You could have done great things with that Sandman story or Harry story. And we know Venom can be done right. But three at the same time is hard.
You can still do it that way. But films aren't the ideal medium for that. I've read plenty of books where it was done just fine. Hell, Lord of the Rings had no problem juggling multiple plot points and conflicts at any given time.
I get that and I think those are absolutely great reasons but another one of the reasons that I hear is that it's so he can stand toe to toe with Superman better than a younger Batman. That doesn't make sense if this is the first time he's encountering super humans let alone super human on this level.
I'm all for the other reasons. I think it's a smart move TBH. But this DKR reasoning for it makes no sense. I'll just wait and see what makes it into the movie.
It depends what Batman's motive is when they first have their physical confrontation. If Superman gets hot headed and attacks Batman without holding back it could back fire if Bruce is recording the entire fight and broadcasting it across the world to prove that Clark/Kal-El is a danger to society. Also, if Kryptonite is introduced, it should bring Superman down quite easily if its similar to how the Kryptonian atmosphere affected him in Man of Steel. Their fight is going to only be a few minutes, at the most, anyways but it will be f*cking fantastic to see, especially with Zack Snyder as the director.
All in all, I'm glad Batman is a seasoned veteran. It could be a great dynamic between the two and have them feed off of each other. Kal-El learning the responsibility of being a superhero and Bruce getting the fire back that made him want to become a superhero.
I'm really getting my hopes up about Benedict Cumberbatch being cast. Such an amazing talented actor.
I honestly don't see anything coming out of this fight for Superman.
THIS RIGHT HERE, MAN! This is what I hope will be the focus. The idea that maybe Batman was on the edge of giving in. Maybe he's been just going through the motions at this point. But when he really sees the fire the passion and the thirst to do good that Superman (hopefully) puts on full undeniable display it sparks something in him. He sees what he was when he first started and what he still can be in this coming golden age.
Superman sees a war vet. A man beaten down by the chaos around him be completely unwilling to break. The human will to fight at it's apex in this man. It's almost terrifying. Superman can lift mountains, but the fight in this man's war torn eyes could halt time itself. So much can be learned from this man.
So much should be learned from each other.