None of those vague strokes makes her instantly more qualified. They just as easily make her qualified to be a general rather than leader of the JLA. I'm biasing my prediction for Superman leading off the implication that he'll be growing and developing as a public figure and hero from the first movie and interviews following it. I'm also biasing it off the idea presented in the first movie that explicitly sates that he'll "be the bridge between world". They could do something very clever and make it so the worlds have new meaning in that he'll be the bridge between humanity and super humanity aka a leader (this would contaminate as being leader of the JLa possibly)
Superman's myth with be grown and created here in real time. I think that a cool idea. I also think it give a bit more validity to the idea that Superman is the throughline in the DCCU.As I said, Batman will have a full version of his mythos behind him, his fans are especulating which Robin will have died
But you've seen him in one movie. How can you judge his qualifications off one outing? I don't think he can lead much of anything now but in time maybe. What I'm suggesting is that he build up to that role over all the movies in incitements. They want him to lead but he's not so sure he'd be ready. Then push comes to shove and the world needs him to so he leads to JLA in their darkest hour. Snyder made a really big deal about the idea of starting the DCCU with Superman so I'd like to see a great amount of pay off because of that.but I also think this Clark is the least qualified to lead of all versions.
Also I don't mean him leading as in leading the free world, but just the JLA and being the inspiration for other super humans to do go and intermingle with the world at large out in the open.
I agree.No, no, calm down, we just have personal preferences.