Axel Alonso, Charles Soule, Cullen Bunn, Jeff Lemire and Humberto Ramos reveal what's in store for Marvel's uncanny characters post-"Secret Wars."
Full article here.
Axel Alonso, Charles Soule, Cullen Bunn, Jeff Lemire and Humberto Ramos reveal what's in store for Marvel's uncanny characters post-"Secret Wars."
Full article here.
how sad they had to lump the inhumans in with the x-men for this panel feel bad for soule, just look at the june numbers teh inhumans secret war books was one of the lowest selling of the secret war tie ins....wouldnt suprise me if marvel paid people in hte crowd to ask inhuman questions to try and create buzz
Two questions about Inhumans so far and both of them were asking about characters that don't appear in the Inhumans books. Plus a third question about Johnny Storm. Hilarious.
Finally, Marvel answers the age-old question: really, what the hell is the difference between Inhumans and mutants? It's pretty obvious Marvel isn't ending X-Men. There's too much money in it for them and they announced, what, five? six? new titles for ANADM? They also have a pretty substantial chunk of Secret Wars titles including the only Infinite Comic tie-in.
So to make uncanny x-men not just another x-rated they didn't use nate and racheal? I guess I can see that. It would have been cool for another team book with a third cast like racheal gambit rogue angel, etc
X-Men Forever
Magik is a very erratic character, it's very difficult to "get her wrong" and she's always popular with readers. So consequently, writers would die for her.
Not one mention of what happened to the X-School, or X-kids. It's literally like a step backwards.
Honestly, Marvel should just have a new mandate that X-kids shouldn't be created by authors anymore, seeing as nothing will be done with them anyways.
>Nice to hear more of the creators talk about their love for and approach to the X-Men. I'm looking forward to October's X-relaunch.
>We almost had a Rachel and X-Man book? Would have been perfect with Cable, too.
Marvel have cannibalized the FF and the X-Men to continue their corporate-mandated Inhumans push, from using the previously X-related 'Uncanny' moniker to dragging Cyclops and Beast and Johnny Storm into the Inhumans fold. Now the fate of mutants and Inhumans has been intertwined. If the Inhumans are so great, why do they need to be tied to the X-franchise going forward? I think Black Bolt et al are awesome but making the X-franchise almost entirely about responding to the terrigen mists and mutant/Inhuman relations? No. Just no. Let the Inhumans sink or swim on the strength of the characters and the writer and artist, not the strength of whatever other Fox movie franchises Marvel can throw into the mix.
Last edited by nx01a; 07-09-2015 at 05:48 PM.
Originally Posted by The General, JLA #38
The sad thing is that the only interesting things in recent memory were with the X-Kids. Wolverine died with nothing interesting. Storm had a series wherein nothing interesting happened. There was another series that was leading to Wolverine being resurrected, but nothing interesting happened there, either. And none of the main books did anything interesting.
Last edited by MyriVerse; 07-11-2015 at 01:01 PM.
f/k/a The Black Guardian
COEXIST | NOEXIST
ShadowcatMagikДаякѕтая Sto☈mDustMercury MonetRachelSage
MagnetoNightcrawlerColossusRockslideBeastXavier
I really wanted Emma in this book instead of Psylocke. If you are going to do a Brotherhood of Evil Mutants redux, than bring in the EEEveeellllll!!