Nope.
When slavery was abolished in the US, slave owners were NOT punished in any way for having owned and abused slaves. They were only forbidden from continuing to own slaves, but there was no effort to punish them for crimes that weren't crimes until slavery became illegal. Those former slave owners went on about their lives and were never punished for what they did unless they continued to do what was now illegal.
And maybe the Amazons WILL pay their debt back to the world. Just not now. Right now? They don't think they DO owe the world a debt for their crimes, because they haven't yet understood that what they did WERE crimes. Once Diana's reforms take hold and the Amazons begin to realize the wrongness of what they did? I'm sure the Amazons WILL consider it their responsibility to make up for past mistakes.
Also? In a way the Amazons have ALWAYS been paying off their debt. They have been protecting Doom's Doorway. They have protected the world for thousands of years from all manner of otherworldly horrors. And they will continue to do so now. So yes, they did some bad things to a few men. They also protected the entire world from being ravaged by monsters, and continue to protect it still.
Now should they do MORE as a form of penance for their misdeeds? Sure. And with Diana's guidance, they will hopefully decide to do exactly that. But once again: they need to first realize that they were wrong and that they DO owe the world for their mistakes.
So do I.I do hope that you're right about Strife influencing the raids or perhaps Hephaestus was just lying about the raids to get Diana to take a particular action.
Strife has been a near-constant presence in this story from day one. And yet despite all that, she's really had very little impact on the progress of the story. She mostly just shows up to be annoying. If Azz's run were to end right now? Strife would seem like a completely superfluous character who really contributed nothing of import to the story. Having it be revealed that she somehow had a MASSIVE impact on the entire story near the end, however, will be dramatic and make her constant presence suddenly make sense.
As for Hephaestus? I've been saying it for a while: Hephaestus is not an unbiased source of information here, I remind you. He already has a problem with women who are so cavalier with their children, based on his own history with Hera. It's quite possible that his account of the raids was ENTIRELY colored with his own bias. We also know that Heph is not opposed to being manipulative. He made that pin for Strife, knowing full well that she intended to use it against his "sister" about whom he claims to care. I won't be surprised if Heph turns out to be not as trustworthy as we've been led to think.
Another important thing to remember is something I've learned from talking to the people on this forum who are Azzarello fans. I've never read anything Azzarello ever wrote before this story, so I don't know his writing tendencies. But the Azz fans on this forum have mentioned it several times: one of Azz's signature storytelling maneuvers is to introduce a plot point, then ignore it for a long time, then come back near the end of the story and reveal that everything is NOT as it seemed. I'm thinking we may be seeing a twist or two coming pretty soon.