Well ESPN is reporting the Eagles are "trying to trade" Matt Barkley because Chip Kelly has been impressed with Tebow's development, and sees Tebow as a good fit for the read option for the Eagles offense in short yardage and goal line situations, so they can protect Bradford who cannot take hits in those situations.
Not sure how accurate those ESPN reports are, but if there is any truth to them, I think Kelly is opening a can of worms if he is thinking of using different QBs depending on the game situation. That barely works for college teams, not sure it could work in a QB driven league like the NFL has become. Of course it could just be ESPN talking heads stirring up crap to fill in dead spots in the NFL news cycle as well.
Barkley is not a star, but he might be step up from what the Redskins have. Not sure Washington could get anything for RGIII in a trade though, not even a late round pick. At this point in the game, teams need cap space to maneuver in season and react to injuries through the course of the season, so no one is going to give anything to Washington and take the cap hit for a guy with questionable health and productivity. Sign him to an NFL minimum deal if he gets cut, sure, but not take on his cap number. So unless a team feels RGIII is better than the QB they have and the player or players they need to cut to make room under the cap, they are not going to give value for him. At this point depth along the roster is more important to teams than taking a flyer on an injury prone underperforming QB who had 1 shining season in the sun.
-M