Originally Posted by
Confuzzled
For a franchise which has become popular by specifically drawing parallels between its characters and issues with discriminated groups of people in real-life and the issues they face, I don't see why a comparison between Mystique and a real woman doesn't work here.
I get what you are saying and normally I would agree with you, but the thing is, I'm not even sure if in this particular case, "sexualization" was the first thing or at least the only thing that was on their minds when they chose to depict her as naked. The statement that we have from the director is that they chose to depict her as having scaly skin because it made her look scary. The earlier incarnations also had her speak in a distorted voice to underline her uncanniness.
I think this franchise has a long way to go when it comes to doing full justice to women and minority characters, but this is one aspect where I don't see how it is all that different from the comics. In fact, I would think the way she is depicted in the movies is definitely less cheesecakey than that impractical 70's costume. You can argue that being naked is just as impractical, but then again, she does have reptile skin in the movies that she doesn't in the comics. The nature and vulnerable levels of that skin could be completely different from normal human skin.