Looking for a recommendation on a Spider-Man Omnibus...
I currently have Amazing Spider-Man 1-3 & Spider-Man by Roger Stern.
I very much enjoy all 4 books as well as Slott's Big Time & Superior Spider-Man.
Out of the few other Spider-Man omnibus floating around, which one do you all recommend I pick up & why?
The only instance of that is in New Avengers 1, and you can jump right into Infinity seamlessly without returning. Everything else can be easily read one book at a time. So yes, I prefer that. Plus the OHCs have the advantage of portability, and for many people are easier to read due to weight and size.
I didn't say it was a negative thing. In fact, I said I liked Hickman. Being critical of something doesn't mean someone thinks it's bad.
I also never said his FF run was cold and calculating. I didn't specify any run actually. It was a general statement about his writing.
I also didn't say "too." I simply said his writing was "is cold, calculated," which is pretty accurate. It's not a negative thing.
Last edited by ER Prest; 07-09-2017 at 05:59 PM.
Here is the Hickman Avengers omni if you're interested . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZRRjig6ryU
I realize this is totally subjective, but compared to other Silver Age material, how is the Daredevil omnibus?
I'm tempted to get it with IST's sale at $56, but I'm also fearful that if I dip my toes into DD, I will feel the gravitational pull to collect ALL of his omnis, and there's just so much, even with reprints.
BUT, having said that, I'm a sucker for SA material, and would like to know how it compares to other Lee SA stuff?
It's probably not FF/SPidey great otherwise we would've got this omni long before now, but is it Thor or X-men level awful? Somewhere in the middle? Totally forgetful? Thanks for reading.
"Boomerang arrow, Kate... It comes back to you in the end. Boomerang. Respect it." - Clint
"Why the hell do you need an arrow that comes back to you after you shoot it, Clint?" - Kate
"Because... Boomerangs." - Clint.
I like Hickman's plots and how they unravel but I would agree that his Avengers run pretty much turned the characters into gears whose sole purpose was to move the plot along. Very little character and you nailed it on the head with the way they talk. I remember after the first few issues going back to that first convo between Cap and I.M. trying to figure out what I missed.
I kept thinking, "adding more team members couldn't have been all they were discussing. It sounded so heavy and deep!" They even had some fancy idea blue print info graphic flow chart thing. I was sure that I was missing something. Nope, they really just meant adding more members.
I hate that it devolves into another poorly thought out Civil War. I feel like every event now is two groups of heroes trying to kill each other.
Its so infrequent we get real long solid runs of a book. I was so appreciative that Hickman was able to do what he did with Avengers. Really if you als factor in his FF work and the SHIELD stuff its is great long term storytelling. You just don't get that anymore in Marvel Comics. The characterization criticisms are legit same with the dialogue. I always wanted to see a run where Hickman did the long term plotting, Spencer the short term plotting and Bendis or Slott doing the issue writing.