Worst Alternate Timeline, Days of Future Past or Age of Apocalypse?

[Nomads1]

Since I'm not a mutant, as far as I know, I'm gonna go with AoA. There, I'd be 100% screwed (and the whole world seemed to be going to hell in a basket). In DOFF, there was a 50/50 chance I'd still be around, plus, IIRC< the US was where things were worse, The rest of the world moved on pretty much unaffected. Selfish, I know, but I had to find some logic with which to decide.

Peace

[Jackraow21]

I agree. DoFP was worse all around. Humanity still had some strongholds in AoA and the mutants didn't have it so bad.

[cc008]

I agree. DoFP was worse all around. Humanity still had some strongholds in AoA and the mutants didn't have it so bad.

Same here.
10char

[1bulma1]

age of Apocalypse is the worst. rogue was used and seduced by a dirty old man aka mr magneto..here is the proof.

he was old enough to be her grandfather, it was perversion and creepy to see them having sex. he had two kids older than her already. AOA is sure the worst.

Rogue_AOA_005.jpg

[People Of The Earth]

What you think would be a worse alternate timeline, Days of Future Past or Age of Apocalypse? Which one do you think would be worse to live in, for example?

DofP hands down.

[nx01a]

Days of Future Past was horrible for everyone. Definitely worse than the Age of Apocalypse.

[yogaflame]

You guys are forgetting Days of Future Past was almost all a USA thing. There were 3 classes and camps and Sentinel totalitarianism in the US, not anywhere else. The Sentinels were about to expand and the other countries of the world would unleash all their nukes to try to stop them. That's why the X-Men were making their big move, to avert worldwide nuclear war.

AoA was worse. All of the world had already been attacked, there were huge swatches of nuclear radiation zones. Humans were killed in the millions, piled up in mountains. Europe and a few bands of humans were holed up and trying to coordinate a counteroffensive, but Apocalypse had the whole world on lock down.

[dragonmp93]

You guys are forgetting Days of Future Past was almost all a USA thing. There were 3 classes and camps and Sentinel totalitarianism in the US, not anywhere else. The Sentinels were about to expand and the other countries of the world would unleash all their nukes to try to stop them. That's why the X-Men were making their big move, to avert worldwide nuclear war.

AoA was worse. All of the world had already been attacked, there were huge swatches of nuclear radiation zones. Humans were killed in the millions, piled up in mountains. Europe and a few bands of humans were holed up and trying to coordinate a counteroffensive, but Apocalypse had the whole world on lock down.

Is just me or people is confusing movie!DOFP with comics!DOFP ?.

[vitamin]

Age of Apocalypse is conceptually bad.

DOFP is the first and the best. Shame today's writers can't seem to write anything but it's bad variations.

[saul_on_the_road_to_damascus]

Age of X was pretty bad...

[vitamin]

It was wonderful. <3

[Juggernaut Punch]

AoA was okay for most mutants, and humans were safe in the parts of the world Apocalypse didn't rule.

DOFP was **** for literally everyone.

[T'Challa Bruce Von Doom]

Is just me or people is confusing movie!DOFP with comics!DOFP ?.

Looks like it.



The Sentinels controlled North America, not the rest of the world. They were about to make their move though, which would prompt a nuclear response.

[yogaflame]

Looks like it.

The Sentinels controlled North America, not the rest of the world. They were about to make their move though, which would prompt a nuclear response.

Someone's paying attention!

Meanwhile in AoA, things have escalated slightly....

[dragonmp93]

AoA was okay for most mutants, and humans were safe in the parts of the world Apocalypse didn't rule.

DOFP was **** for literally everyone.

Well in the movies, where the sentinels end-up hunting everyone, yes.