Sweden to Compensate for Forced Transgender Sterilizations
That they once did that is so messed up.Sweden's center-left government proposed legislation on Monday that would grant compensation to transgender men and women who had to undergo mandatory sterilization in order to have their sex legally reassigned.
Transgender Swedes had to be sterilized before they could legally change their gender until 2013. The government's bill would allow an estimated 800 people to claim 225,000 crowns ($26,000) each in compensation from the state.
"Sterilization as a condition to obtain a change of gender was an expression of a view that society today distances itself from," Healthcare Minister Gabriel Wikstrom said in a statement.
Original join date: 11/23/2004
Eclectic Connoisseur of all things written, drawn, or imaginatively created.
I'm assuming he is going to model his government activity after Bannon rather than his father in law, stay in the shadows instead of having temper tantrums on the internet 24 hours a day.
I'm just gonna guess that existed as a giant FU left behind by previous transphobic lawmakers.
Paul Ryan: House Republicans will continue their push for health-care reform this year
https://www.washingtonpost.com/power...=.6e3ddf96ac19
I'm beginning to think this is just a scheme to fool their hardcore donors and supporters into thinking that they'll finally get Obamacare this time!
Opinions may vary in quality.
My big article on Mariko Tamaki's Hulk & She-Hulk runs, discussing the good, bad, and its creation.
My second big article on She-Hulk, discussing Jason Aaron's focus on her in Avengers #20.
Meanwhile, with other assholes...
Sean Spicey had another press conference and this is how it went when he was asked by NBC’s Kristen Welker about Trump’s ability to work with Freedom Caucus Republicans on future pieces of legislation:
*smashing head against a wall*I think the president learned a lot through this process. And one of the things that's interesting is, when you look back — and I know there's been a lot to make of this — but the president also recognizes that when there's not a deal to be made, when to walk away.
It's not just about making deals, it's about knowing when to walk away from deals and knowing when there's a bad deal that's the only solution. And I think the president understood that while you can get a deal at the time, that sometimes a bad deal is worse than getting a deal. And I think he smartly recognized that what was on the table was not going to be keeping with the vision that he had, and so he decided that this was not the time and that a deal was not at hand.
Then over to Paul Ryan, who posted on Twitter...
The rule in question? The rule about prohibiting the killing hibernating animals.Another regulatory power grab from the Obama Administration is getting rolled back. This one reverses a harmful U.S. Fish and Wildlife rule.
Opinions may vary in quality.
My big article on Mariko Tamaki's Hulk & She-Hulk runs, discussing the good, bad, and its creation.
My second big article on She-Hulk, discussing Jason Aaron's focus on her in Avengers #20.
Never mind found it.http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/a...-exposure-law/
Last edited by mojotastic; 03-27-2017 at 06:54 PM.
Trump Tweeting Tonight
Attachment 47161
Attachment 47162
Sounds like he's getting worried, trying to deflect.
Original join date: 11/23/2004
Eclectic Connoisseur of all things written, drawn, or imaginatively created.
Opinions may vary in quality.
My big article on Mariko Tamaki's Hulk & She-Hulk runs, discussing the good, bad, and its creation.
My second big article on She-Hulk, discussing Jason Aaron's focus on her in Avengers #20.
"A happy ending? So unlikely. We're not having a moment here.
Wrong city, wrong people, all huddling in fear.
No one escapes the slaughterhouse, and that's just where you're at.
(You could've asked Rebecca but then Adam stomped her flat.)
You think you're special cuz you're scrappy? You're deluded, time to go.
Lucy's living on the moon but you're another dead psycho."
The HB 1986 from Arkansas read like this for what i could find it allows people to charge someone for indecent exposure, in the article i posted i found this:
"Indecent exposure, it argues, is any situation where someone ‘knowingly exposes his or her sex organs to a person of the opposite biological sex: (A) In a public place or in public view; or (B) Under circumstances in which the person could reasonably believe the conduct is likely to cause affront or alarm.’"
So from I am getting, if I as a male shows my penis to a women while in the bus station i can be sue because of it, right?