Meanwhile, Cambridge Analytica has closing up shop. Hell of a day, isn't it?
Meanwhile, Cambridge Analytica has closing up shop. Hell of a day, isn't it?
Opinions may vary in quality.
My big article on Mariko Tamaki's Hulk & She-Hulk runs, discussing the good, bad, and its creation.
My second big article on She-Hulk, discussing Jason Aaron's focus on her in Avengers #20.
They kept it at a little over 25 million. The hold up was that one of the people in the class action suit filed some kind of motion because she said she was prevented from leaving the class action suit. She wanted to have her own suit but I think she had missed the deadline to withdraw anyway.
NY Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman issued an interesting official statement on the case
If the Democrats were smart, they should make a list of everything the GOP has done to enable this fraud of a President, even the little things like his frequent trips to his golf course at Mar a Lago. I wonder what the cost of those trips adds up to so far.
My comment was in the context of people here suggesting Republicans hadn't done anything good since Nixon.
I was also trying to find something that was significant, and met a very high burden of proof, that a generally liberal group of readers could agree with. You guys will probably trust someone on Thinkprogress who thinks Bush is underrated more than someone from National Review.
If you want the most recent developments, here's a useful online resource that lists all the bills that have been signed by Trump, and gone through the Republican congress.
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bil...nt_status_date
On Monday, they voted to designate a National Memorial to Fallen Educators. That appears to be the most recent bill. Recent votes include reauthorizing amber alerts in Indian Country, allowing states to prosecute websites involved in sex trafficking, an establishment for a date for compliance for ceiling fans and energy standards, higher standards for day health care for veterans, allowing development in the city of Old Town, Maine, and a travel reciprocity for visits for high level officials from and to Taiwan. For whatever reason, there were a lot of Veterans Affairs administration votes on March 9th.
The 15 most popular Governors in the United States are Republicans, so if you want to look up recent things Republicans have done that are beneficial you could google them.
https://morningconsult.com/2018/04/1...lar-governors/
Right now, the negotiations for a ceasefire with North and South Korea seem to be going well. Both Koreas seem to be on board with how things are going, so there's also that.
Sincerely,
Thomas Mets
Things are not going well for Michael Cohen's other business....Business Insider reports Uber and Lyft played a key role in Trump lawyer Michael Cohen's financial downfall
I know I read recently in the Chicago Tribune that he has taxi medallions in Chicago that are suspended also. No wonder he was complaining about Trump not paying back that money that went to Stormy Daniels, for which he had to take out a loan. He's not exactly a pauper but his legal defense bills could get really big really fast.Cohen and his wife, Laura, built up a substantial taxi business in New York on the back of their 32 taxi licenses, known as medallions.
But the value of a medallion has plummeted to roughly $163,000 from more than $1 million within the past four years amid Uber and Lyft's gains in the taxi market, according to the report.
Meanwhile, the Cohens' income from their taxi fleet diminished as millions of dollars in loans they took out for the business went underwater. Now their taxi companies have piled up unpaid taxes and fines, and about half of their medallions have been suspended, Bloomberg reported, citing city records.
The taxi business the Cohens built is "deeply in debt and losing money daily," Bloomberg reported.
They took out at least 16 loans based on the once sky-high value of the medallions, according to Bloomberg. Sterling National Bank, which lent the Cohens cash, said in a November filing that it had loans out to three taxi borrowers and that all were at high risk of default.
Poll finds 4M lost health insurance in last two years
http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare...te-is-climbing
About 4 million Americans lost health insurance in the last two years, according to a new survey from the Commonwealth Fund, which attributed the decline to actions taken by the Trump administration.
The uninsured rate was up significantly compared with 2016 among adults with an individual income of about $30,000 and a family income of about $61,000.
I don’t know if this had already been mentioned, but Tammie Jo Shults, the pilot who successfully landed that stricken Southwest Airlnes jet in Philadelphia was invited to the White House Monday for some gladhanding with Dolt45. Meanwhile, James Shaw Jr., the young man who disarmed that half naked nutbag at Waffle House last month hasn’t been given so much as a mention by Trump, never mind a visit to the Oval Office. Why is that? I think we all know why, because Shults is white and Shaw is black, and Trump, being a bigot, wants nothing to do with a good BLACK guy who disarmed a bad guy WITHOUT a gun.
Avatar: Here's to the late, great Steve Dillon. Best. Punisher. Artist. EVER!
Speaking of Southwest, they had another plane go down today with a blown window.
"Always listen to the crazy scientist with a weird van or armful of blueprints and diagrams." -- Vibranium
North Korea has agreed to release all American detainees
Last edited by Gryphon; 05-02-2018 at 03:07 PM.
The main reason for the loss of coverage is that people don't want to pay for it. It's not that they're losing an awesome benefit.
I'd imagine that would be good publicity, especially for an indie.
Definitely. But it's not a story of the right inflating the significance of idiots on the left. Among other things, twitter promoted the story as a moment, prior to the right-wing pushback at the appropriation pushback.
When you say you love someone in a role, it typically suggests they look like the actor.
Sincerely,
Thomas Mets
Esquire has a spotlight on Jordan Peterson, a philosopher who has become popular on the right. It's generally rather favorable
In these moments, Peterson is filled with frustration that so many need his message, for want of what had once been common wisdom. At the refusal to address men in the language that summons them to embrace their better instincts. (Yes, Peterson is one of those problematic figures who believe that men have a nature that is best appealed to in ways consistent with that nature.) Why has no one ever set these young men straight before? Where were their fathers? Where were their teachers? Why have they left it up to him, a YouTube personality, to roust them from their hiding places and send them out into the world?
12 Rules for Life is nominally a self-help book, with each chapter heading consisting of a rule: Stand up straight with your shoulders back. Treat yourself like someone you are responsible for helping. Set your house in perfect order before you criticize the world. Pursue what is meaningful (not what is expedient). Tell the truth—or, at least, don’t lie. The rules are followed by long chapters that mingle personal anecdote with practical advice and an idiosyncratic mix, familiar from his lectures, of secular homiletics, biblical references, Jungian archetypes, twentieth-century history, and scientific findings. As of this writing, it is a best-selling nonfiction title in the U. S., Canada, the UK, Australia, and New Zealand.
Peterson teaches at the University of Toronto and, until his book became a surprise global hit, he was also a practicing clinician. He has since put his practice on hold and taken an indefinite sabbatical from teaching to continue his journey into a curious sort of fame, one without any clear definition, fixed limit, or certain future. “I was talking about this with my kids the other day,” the father of two says. “What am I exactly? Most days, I can’t even think of my situation more broadly because it’s changing very rapidly.”
Peterson inhabits a polarized and fractured media landscape in which the very concept of a consensus reality has become undone, perhaps permanently. He is promoted by Random House Canada as a bearer of timeless truths and denounced on Canadian public television as a borderline fascist.
Many of Peterson’s seemingly grandiose pronouncements are, in fact, quite modest. He is often derided for repackaging banal common sense in a vague and pretentious idiom, and there is something to this. Peterson is an apologist for a set of beliefs that we once took for granted but now require an articulate defense, such as: Free speech is an essential value; perfect equality inevitably conflicts with individual freedom; one should be cautious before attempting to reengineer social institutions that appear to be working; men and women are, in certain quantifiable respects, different. His life advice concerns the necessity to defer gratification, face up to the trials of life with equanimity, take responsibility for one’s own choices, and struggle against the temptation to grow resentful. How such traditional values came to be portrayed as a danger adjacent to Nazism is one of the puzzles of our time.In mid-2016, Peterson was a tenured professor at the University of Toronto. If not exactly an eminent figure, he had authored a robust and frequently cited body of publications. He taught a course based on his book and was regularly named one of three life-changing professors at the university. He had started a popular YouTube channel on which he was posting videos of his lectures. Off campus, he maintained a clinical practice; he consulted with corporations; and he appeared now and then on public television. No one would have regarded him as a potential vector of global controversy.
Then, in September of that year, Peterson posted a video stating his opposition to C-16, a Canadian bill that sought to make gender identity and expression protected categories. He argued that the law might compel people to adopt a panoply of gender-neutral pronouns, something he declared he would not do. He judged these pronouns—zie, and zir, and they, to name three of the more than seventy and growing such terms—to be the invention of “postmodern neo-Marxists” seeking to use state power to decree that gender differences were not biologically based but rather social constructions that could be made or unmade at will. Peterson made plain that he was speaking out against the enforced adoption of an unscientific political terminology, and not to denigrate the transgendered. Yet it was easy to call it an act of hate and harassment directed at a vulnerable minority, and many did. He received two letters of warning from his university, but no further action was taken.
In November 2017, Lindsay Shepherd, a teaching assistant at Wilfrid Laurier University, wanted to spark debate among students about C-16, so she showed a clip of Peterson discussing the new law. University administrators accused her of “creating a toxic climate” in her classroom. In a surreptitious recording subsequently uploaded to the Internet, a professor likened Shepherd’s actions to “neutrally playing a speech by Hitler or Milo Yiannopoulos” and claimed that showing the video placed her in violation of C-16; in the tape, Shepherd is brought to tears. And though the assertion carried no legal weight, to some it appeared to justify Peterson’s concerns. The university later issued an apology and conceded that it had never received any student complaints about the video.It's interesting how a figure who seems reasonable is so controversial.onto videos of Kermit the Frog, a play on his somewhat Muppetlike voice.
Peterson’s fame on these subversive platforms is often used to paint him in ominous tones. “I have something in common with Nazis,” he told me, “in that I am opposed to the radical left. And when you oppose the radical left, you end up being a part of a much larger group that includes Nazis in it.” But his refusal of the consolations of group identity also puts him at odds with the alt-right. “The alt-righters would say—and they’ve said this to me directly—‘Peterson, you’re wrong. Identity politics is correct. We just have to play to win.’ I think that’s a reprehensible attitude. But I understand exactly why you would come to that conclusion.
“What I’m saying with my YouTube videos is ‘Okay, there’s a different way of playing the whole game. Forget about the bloody group-identity framework and concentrate on what you can do as an individual.’ ”
Sincerely,
Thomas Mets
Great analysis... so good.
Reminds me of Kemp.
Georgia Gubernatorial Candidate Points Gun at Teen in New Ad
The ONLY thing this moron has ever done for me is sponsoring my daughter for the Air Force Academy. She wanted in so I had no choice, BUT he's a warmonger so he sponsored her without a doubt. That said. I hate this mofo...
Why are we still listening to him?