Page 224 of 440 FirstFirst ... 124174214220221222223224225226227228234274324 ... LastLast
Results 3,346 to 3,360 of 6586
  1. #3346
    Spectacular Member Kuro no Shinigami's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    154

    Default

    There was a discussion about Donald Trump's father raising a monster in the other thread.

    Do you think that a monster is born a monster or becomes a monster?

    Some children who grew in an abusive household were Adolf Hitler and Richard Allen Davis. Other children including Sir Patrick Stewart and Bill Clinton who grew up in an abusive household with a father whose parenting methods are similar to Fred Trump didn't become monsters

  2. #3347
    Extraordinary Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    5,842

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kuro no Shinigami View Post
    There was a discussion about Donald Trump's father raising a monster in the other thread.

    Do you think that a monster is born a monster or becomes a monster?

    Some children who grew in an abusive household were Adolf Hitler and Richard Allen Davis. Other children including Sir Patrick Stewart and Bill Clinton who grew up in an abusive household with a father whose parenting methods are similar to Fred Trump didn't become monsters
    Monsters *grow* one way or another - nature can and does play a part with the “base” material, nurture provides a kind of “cultivating” and “grooming” effect, but eventually the “output” of both has to use their own agency to walk the final steps towards being a monster, particularly large scale ones.
    Like action, adventure, rogues, and outlaws? Like anti-heroes, femme fatales, mysteries and thrillers?

    I wrote a book with them. Outlaw’s Shadow: A Sherwood Noir. Robin Hood’s evil counterpart, Guy of Gisbourne, is the main character. Feel free to give it a look: https://read.amazon.com/kp/embed?asi...E2PKBNJFH76GQP

  3. #3348
    Spectacular Member Kuro no Shinigami's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    154

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by godisawesome View Post
    Monsters *grow* one way or another - nature can and does play a part with the “base” material, nurture provides a kind of “cultivating” and “grooming” effect, but eventually the “output” of both has to use their own agency to walk the final steps towards being a monster, particularly large scale ones.
    I agree. Nature versus nurture does play a role in one's upbringing.

    For example, Donald Trump could have become his own man but ended up being a carbon copy of his father. Maybe it is in his genes. Maybe Fred nurtured him too much. The greedy desire to inherit his daddy's vast fortune might have been the final step towards being a monster.

    Donald's brother Fred Junior tried to become his own man rather than follow in his daddy's footsteps. but he failed at that. He drank himself to death afterwards.

  4. #3349
    insulin4all CaptCleghorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    10,933

    Default

    Having raised a grand total of one child, I can speak to his development. The nature vs. nurture argument is one that IMHO has no defined boundary. Sure there are aspects that are obviously genetic, but even with being born a certain way life will give a person experiences to flavor their choices. I do know that kids learn from examples and even with my raising my son, I see where he's picked up both good and not-so-good qualities.

    Looking at examples like the Trumps or the Kennedys, we can see where similar socioeconomic circumstances provide very different. Politics are very heavily flavored by family. But in the words of my son, "I grew up thinking of myself as a liberal. Then I went to college in Cambridge (MA) and realized I was more conservative than I thought."

    As for Trump specifically, I believe that children need to realize that they must face consequences of their misdeeds. Sure, every kid gets away with some stuff, but if there's a miraculous cover-up and bailing out when misdeeds are discovered, no conscience is gained.

  5. #3350
    Ultimate Member Gray Lensman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    15,259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kuro no Shinigami View Post
    There was a discussion about Donald Trump's father raising a monster in the other thread.

    Do you think that a monster is born a monster or becomes a monster?

    Some children who grew in an abusive household were Adolf Hitler and Richard Allen Davis. Other children including Sir Patrick Stewart and Bill Clinton who grew up in an abusive household with a father whose parenting methods are similar to Fred Trump didn't become monsters
    It depends on the person. Some people just become monsters no matter how well they were raised. Others become decent people despite having all the cards stacked against them. But personally I think nurture plays a role for most people - possibly the biggest role, but there are always exceptions and we shouldn't discount that.
    Dark does not mean deep.

  6. #3351
    Invincible Member Kirby101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    20,571

    Default

    Hard to say. We know the Trumps were a horrible family going back to his great grandfather. We also know Fred Trump was a terrible father. In the genes or in the culture? A combination of both probably. But Donald seems to have been a sociopath since he was a child, so I would say he was born with a lot of his tendencies.
    There came a time when the Old Gods died! The Brave died with the Cunning! The Noble perished locked in battle with unleashed Evil! It was the last day for them! An ancient era was passing in fiery holocaust!

  7. #3352
    BANNED Starter Set's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    3,772

    Default

    The whole redskin drama has to be the most ridiculous thing i have seen since Trump's election as president of those US of A.

  8. #3353
    Invincible Member Kirby101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    20,571

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Starter Set View Post
    The whole redskin drama has to be the most ridiculous thing i have seen since Trump's election as president of those US of A.
    How so? The name has always been an abomination.
    There came a time when the Old Gods died! The Brave died with the Cunning! The Noble perished locked in battle with unleashed Evil! It was the last day for them! An ancient era was passing in fiery holocaust!

  9. #3354
    Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    18,747

    Default

    For decades, in the Canadian Football League, there was the Saskatchewan Roughriders and the Ottawa Rough Riders. There was constant debate about who should give up the name. In the end, the Ottawa franchise folded. When they came back as a new franchise, they were the Ottawa Renegades. That team folded when they lost their stadium. Finally they came back in their new incarnation as the Ottawa Redblacks. Which is an odd name. You do have names like that in rugby, but on the face of it Redblack could seem vaguely offensive. It's based on the team uniforms having red and black. And it's a call back to the days of the lumberjacks in the Ottawa valley, who wore red and black check shirts. That shirt is a staple in every Canadian home. But I think they should have just called themselves the Ottawa Lumberjack Shirts.

  10. #3355
    I am invenitable Jack Dracula's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Slouching toward Bethlehem
    Posts
    5,070

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirby101 View Post
    How so? The name has always been an abomination.
    There is the argument that changing sports team names is probably the least helpful crusade to commit resources to.
    The Cover Contest Weekly Winners ThreadSo much winning!!

    "When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

    “It’s your party and you can cry if you want to.” - Captain Europe

  11. #3356
    Spectacular Member Kuro no Shinigami's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    154

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gray Lensman View Post
    It depends on the person. Some people just become monsters no matter how well they were raised. Others become decent people despite having all the cards stacked against them. But personally I think nurture plays a role for most people - possibly the biggest role, but there are always exceptions and we shouldn't discount that.

    Yes, Sir Patrick Stewart is a good exception. The way he described his father in an interview, I believe Stewart's father sounded a lot like Fred Trump.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Stewart

    Patrick Stewart spent much of his childhood in Jarrow and grew up in a poor household with domestic violence from his father, an experience which later influenced his political and ideological beliefs. His father Alfred worked as a general labourer and as a postman. As a result of his wartime experience during the Dunkirk evacuation, his father suffered from what was then known as combat fatigue (related to what is now known as post-traumatic stress disorder). In a 2008 interview, Stewart said:

    My father was a very potent individual, a very powerful man, who got what he wanted. It was said that when he strode onto the parade ground, birds stopped singing. It was many, many years before I realised how my father inserted himself into my work. I've grown a moustache for Macbeth. My father didn't have one, but when I looked in the mirror just before I went on stage I saw my father's face staring straight back at me.
    So Sir Patrick compared his father to Macbeth. I am glad he didn't end up being like his father.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macbeth

    Macbeth was a Scottish general who receives a prophecy that one day he will become King of Scotland. Consumed by ambition and spurred to action by his wife, Macbeth murders King Duncan and takes the Scottish throne for himself. He is then wracked with guilt and paranoia. Forced to commit more and more murders to protect himself from enmity and suspicion, he soon becomes a tyrannical ruler. The bloodbath and consequent civil war swiftly take Macbeth and Lady Macbeth into the realms of madness and death.

    Speaking of which, doesn't Donald Trump remind you a bit of Macbeth?
    Last edited by Kuro no Shinigami; 07-18-2020 at 11:51 AM.

  12. #3357
    Boisterously Confused
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    9,499

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kuro no Shinigami View Post
    ...Macbeth was a Scottish general...wracked with guilt and paranoia....doesn't Donald Trump remind you a bit of Macbeth?
    Trump doesn't have the guts to be a soldier, and he is utterly devoid of the emotional capabilities that would enable guilt. So, no, not really.

  13. #3358
    Spectacular Member Kuro no Shinigami's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    154

    Default

    ...Macbeth was a Scottish general...wracked with guilt and paranoia....doesn't Donald Trump remind you a bit of Macbeth?
    Quote Originally Posted by DrNewGod View Post
    Trump doesn't have the guts to be a soldier, and he is utterly devoid of the emotional capabilities that would enable guilt. So, no, not really.
    So Trump was also not paranoid?

  14. #3359
    Ultimate Member Gray Lensman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    15,259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kuro no Shinigami View Post
    So Trump was also not paranoid?
    Paranoid, yes. But by being incapable of feeling guilt, and not even brave enough to fire someone face to face, it makes me think MacBeth is a poor figure to compare Trump too. I doubt Trump would go down swinging if faced with the end like MacBeth was, but would instead go down whining and pleading. The wounds would all be on his back.
    Dark does not mean deep.

  15. #3360
    Mighty Member C_Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,780

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ChadH View Post
    There is the argument that changing sports team names is probably the least helpful crusade to commit resources to.
    Least helpful? Sure. It doesn't actually do anything. But it also requires very little in the way of public resources. Sometimes there's nothing wrong with symbolic change.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •