Ah I didn't know that. But you said it yourself that it might not be a native life form and unless noted as such ,that wouldn't be contradicting the narrative
Ok just to be clear . The planets themselves don't have to be uniform but the character's reaction to them in the same story at least should be . That the planets are themselves neither uniform nor noted to be such ( planets that is) is simply another mark on top of thatI am confused at the inconsistency of your argument. You agree that planets are not all uniform, but you would like them to be, at least when depicted within the confines of the same story arc. I disagree that all planets should be the same vanilla flavour.
Eh unless it's explicitly contradicting the narration ( like the moon "around" Thor not exploding ), on panel feats + narration to explain their nature is just fine. Does the presence of a ( possibly alien , in your own words ) , maybe sentient life form make the world exploding on panel invalid ? I don't think soLet me clarify, I m not arguing that Gladiator did not bust a planet. Just that if you look hard enough at any feat you could probably find a few holes. Your indicator in this instance is the narrative, which called the planet a "lifeless" world, and Gladiator a "God", an argument could be made that the narration is full of hyperbole and should be dismissed as i) there was life on that world (might not have been native but even so) and ii) Gladiator is not a "God" and not typically portrayed as such.
Does Thor not having the moon explode around him when narration says " worlds are shattered around him" make the feat invalid ? Especially when the world / whatever below him is also not exploding ? Yeah , since it directly contradicts what's being said
As for Gladiator being a God , that's eh very clearly hyperbole , nothing on panel suggests him being one as opposed to the world being shattered on panel
I suspect though you are right . It's a more case by case basis than the sweeping generalisation I'm making
With BRB it's more that it's contradicted by his own reaction to planets exploding in the very series and his career as a whole more than anything . If narration (or something ) had explicitly noted otherwise we wouldn't be looking at it so closely I guessSometimes, you can miss the forest for the trees, and I feel (I stress feel as this is completely subjective) that we are doing it here with BRB's feat.
Edit: I just realised I am guilty of this^^ *facepalm* you are right the BRB feat is a one shot, it's a charged up strike but is one hit. Apologies DK.
But it doesn't and it comes across as at best inconsistent with not only his career but also the series itself .