You never know, sure, but past work is the best predictor of execution you're likely to get.
If you've got a guy who pitches a great idea but has written a bunch of terrible comics, it's unlikely they've just been waiting for this one to become the next Alan Moore.
Writing is ALL execution; the ideas are everywhere, and cheaper than dirt.
I honestly think Lemire's approach was the perfect way to do synergy. I had never read a comic before a couple years ago and started to because of Arrow. The first book I ever picked up was Kill Machine and it was a perfect entry point. It had characters I recognized (Oliver, Diggle, Shado and Count Vertigo) but in completely different roles. It also had a similar tone to the show but with an equally as ambitious and unique plotline.
By the time Kreisberg's run came out I was as much a comic fan as an Arrow one, so its hard to say if my experience as someone who started reading comics due to Arrow still applied, but I definitely stopped reading it after the first couple issues. It just wasn't interesting reading a lesser, carbon copy version of Arrow.
Current Pull: Lazarus, The Realm, Seven to Eternity, Aquaman, Flash, Justice League Dark, Justice League Odyssey, Sideways, Black Panther, Captain America, Daredevil, Death of the Inhumans.
Future Pull: Killmonger.
The problem with directly modeling the comics after other media is that other media tends to come and go but the comic continuity is here for decades. The Post-Crisis Universe saw 3 independent film versions of Batman (Batman/Returns, the two horrible 90's movies, the Dark Knight series) as well as at least four different animated versions (Timm, The Batman, Brave and the Bold and the other DC animated movies).
It would be difficult to tailor Batman in a way to appeal to fans of all of these properties.
Clearly in retrospect the Timm and Nolan versions of the character are the best but there are many irreconcilable differences between the two interpretations.
This only gets more muddied if we start to look at video games as well, not to mention offshoot properties like the Lego franchise.
What are we going to do when we have two distinct live action versions of Barry Allen running around, not to mention the animated movie version of the character or any future animated TV show version.
DC has to make hard decisions today that will affect what they can do in the future. So they need to tread lightly.
I have very mixed feelings about this. I do like to see new things tried. But, when I'm reading or viewing serial media (comic books series or TV series) I really like follow-through - the sense that the writers have thought about what they're doing and are heading somewhere with their stories. And that, if I open myself up to being engaged with the characters and situations I'm reading about, I won't have the rug unceremoniously pulled out from under me. Too often.
How many reboots/resets/rebirths do they need in a given span of time? Reading a lot of The New 52, it often feels to me like the editors and writers are communicating to us: hey, we're not very interested in what we've presented here, the way we've set up the characters and their world. I think we'll just switch direction now. Again.
And if they're not interested, how interested can they expect me to be?
On the other hand: The New 52 was, for me, the very worst rug-pulling reboot I've ever seen. (And I've been reading since long before Crisis on Infinite Earths.) A lot of what they've done I'm not enjoying anyway, and they keep changing it around. "Story Over Continuity" has often meant no follow-through at all, and a lot of confusion. So maybe this Rebirth will lead to a better environment overall.
And if it gives us a Supergirl more like the TV show - rather than one so defined by anger that it made sense to make her a Red Lantern - well, that, at least, would be a good thing!
But that's just me.
Doctor Bifrost
"If Roy G. Bivolo had seen some B&W pencil sketches, his whole life would have turned out differently." http://doctorbifrost.blogspot.com/
One the other hand that terrible writer with a great pitch could be exactly the right fit for the comic he or she is pitching for and could find themselves writing their best work to date. You just never know. Admittedly there are writers that just aren't good no matter what but even good writers can have a bad day or even a string of bad comics and sometimes that can stem from being put on a book or character that just doesn't suit the writer. Even editors can make mistakes despite how talented a writer is.
Supporting LION FORGE COMICS and other independent publishers.
Check out Lion Forge's Catalyst Prime Universe. Its the best damned superhero verse in comics. Diverse characters and interesting stories set in a universe where anyone can be a hero. And company that prides itself on representation both in the comics themselves and in the people behind them.
Oh my goodness gracious! I've been bamboozled!
When we hit our lowest point, we are open to the greatest change. AVATAR AANG
Whether there is a reboot or not for Supergirl, the origin of Supergirl is more or less the same krypton origin with every retelling (except for the old shape changing matrix origin and earth angel origin). The tv has good ideas in using lots of aliens in the show. I prefer even more aliens like the whole United Planets having aliens on earth via star gates, New Gods as aliens, Qward thunderers as aliens on earth, shadow demon aliens from Mobius, etc. The old Lois and Clark tv show also had lots of kryptonian survivors from a colony of krypton (New Krypton).
Last edited by colonyofcells; 01-27-2016 at 12:02 AM.