Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Amazing Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    39

    Default A Cursory Look at Meredith Finch's Previous (And Only) Work

    See her previous work here:

    http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/03/...les-from-oz-2/

    It's awful.

    Like, REALLY bad.

    Well, it was nice having an award-winning, universally critically acclaimed Wonder Woman book while it lasted.....

  2. #2
    Extraordinary Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    7,505

    Default

    Hmmmm.

    Okay, there is no doubt that the way the male characters are being shown is pretty sexist.

    On the other hand, is that the intention? By which I mean, is Finch deliberately writing them as sexist because that is exactly what they are supposed to be?

    Also, I've gotta say that ever since the scene in the Kevin Costner Robin Hood a few years back, where Maid Marion takes a good long look at Robin's naked butt under the waterfall without his knowing, I don't know that we can cry foul to much about guys doing the same thing. In fact not even as "bad", since this female shown in the comic is fully clothed. What's good for the goose really should be good for the gander when it comes to having one [a gander*, I mean].

    Didn't I see the Birds of Prey in a male strip club?

    Seems to me I would have to read the whole issue for myself before being able to make any kind of informed analysis. Selected exerts are just that - selected.



    *Aussie slang - having a gander means looking at something.
    If ten years of recording The Young and the Restless for my mother have taught me anything, it's that characters in serial dramas are always happily in love...until they're not

    “The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. Instead of altering their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views...which can be very uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the facts that needs altering.” - the 4th Doctor

  3. #3
    Mighty Member billee0918's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    1,074

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by C-IN2 View Post
    See her previous work here:

    http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/03/...les-from-oz-2/

    It's awful.

    Like, REALLY bad.

    Well, it was nice having an award-winning, universally critically acclaimed Wonder Woman book while it lasted.....
    Ugh, bummer to hear the new run's acclaim falls short of Azz's. I can't find any reviews tho, can you share?

  4. #4
    Extraordinary Member Dr. Poison's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Appleton, WI
    Posts
    6,830

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brettc1 View Post
    Hmmmm.

    Okay, there is no doubt that the way the male characters are being shown is pretty sexist.

    On the other hand, is that the intention? By which I mean, is Finch deliberately writing them as sexist because that is exactly what they are supposed to be?

    Also, I've gotta say that ever since the scene in the Kevin Costner Robin Hood a few years back, where Maid Marion takes a good long look at Robin's naked butt under the waterfall without his knowing, I don't know that we can cry foul to much about guys doing the same thing. In fact not even as "bad", since this female shown in the comic is fully clothed. What's good for the goose really should be good for the gander when it comes to having one [a gander*, I mean].

    Didn't I see the Birds of Prey in a male strip club?

    Seems to me I would have to read the whole issue for myself before being able to make any kind of informed analysis. Selected exerts are just that - selected.



    *Aussie slang - having a gander means looking at something.

    Very well said, brettc1.
    Currently(or soon to be) Reading: Alan Scott: Green Lantern, Batman/Superman: World's Finest, Fire & Ice: Welcome to Smallville, Green Arrow, Green Lantern, Jay Garrick: The Flash, Justice Society of America, Power Girl, Superman, Shazam, Titans, Wesley Dodds: Sandman, Wonder Woman, & World's Finest: Teen Titans.

  5. #5
    Extraordinary Member Vanguard-01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    8,441

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brettc1 View Post
    Hmmmm.

    Okay, there is no doubt that the way the male characters are being shown is pretty sexist.

    On the other hand, is that the intention? By which I mean, is Finch deliberately writing them as sexist because that is exactly what they are supposed to be?

    Also, I've gotta say that ever since the scene in the Kevin Costner Robin Hood a few years back, where Maid Marion takes a good long look at Robin's naked butt under the waterfall without his knowing, I don't know that we can cry foul to much about guys doing the same thing. In fact not even as "bad", since this female shown in the comic is fully clothed. What's good for the goose really should be good for the gander when it comes to having one [a gander*, I mean].

    Didn't I see the Birds of Prey in a male strip club?

    Seems to me I would have to read the whole issue for myself before being able to make any kind of informed analysis. Selected exerts are just that - selected.



    *Aussie slang - having a gander means looking at something.
    I have to comment here, because it's so rare for me to get to agree with you these days!

    Another important thing to remember about this issue is that Meredith Finch was only the CO-writer of this book. It's hard to tell which parts were her contribution and which parts weren't.

    Just about the only part of this post with which I must disagree? Seriously? The "Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves" was "just a few years ago? Dude, I was a KID when that movie came out! It was one of the first mature movies my parents let me see.
    Though much is taken, much abides; and though
    We are not now that strength which in old days
    Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are,
    One equal temper of heroic hearts,
    Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
    To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.

    --Lord Alfred Tennyson--

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brettc1 View Post
    On the other hand, is that the intention? By which I mean, is Finch deliberately writing them as sexist because that is exactly what they are supposed to be?
    That's a good point actually. They look like tribal warriors of old (and lions on top of it), so sexism is pretty natural for them.

    But besides that, this doesnt look so good, and i'm not thrilled about that witch in skimpy clothes. And in general, i dont get this in comics nowadays. Back in my day, when kids used to read comics, some semi nudity was appreciated, because it was hard to find. Now, not only do kids NOT read comics, but even if they do, they have iphones that can access the internet and find porn with just one click. So what's the point of this kind of crap, except perhaps self gratification?

  7. #7
    BANNED
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    224

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by C-IN2 View Post
    See her previous work here:

    http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/03/...les-from-oz-2/

    It's awful.

    Like, REALLY bad.

    Well, it was nice having an award-winning, universally critically acclaimed Wonder Woman book while it lasted.....
    I like what I see so far; I guess it depends on your taste, but this just seems more normalized. I like how she doesn't seem too focused on catering to feminists and this is just what's in order for Wonder Woman; I don't say that because I have lots of things against feminists, I just think the Wonder Woman comic needs a break from efforts to cater to the feminists so that the writer can focus on writing a particular story as comfortably as possible.
    Last edited by dshipp17; 07-01-2014 at 10:38 AM.

  8. #8
    Mighty Member Mr. Mastermind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    1,178

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dshipp17 View Post
    I like what I see so far; I guess it depends on your taste, but this just seems more normalized. I like how she doesn't seem too focused on catering to feminists and this is just what's in order for Wonder Woman; I don't say that because I have lots of things against feminists, I just think the Wonder Woman comic needs a break from efforts to cater to the feminists so that the writer can focus on writing a particular story as comfortably as possible.
    If Wonder Woman is a feminist character (and she is) then what's the point of alienating feminists? That's like writing a Daredevil comic that insults the disabled.

    And the comic looks just as good as I expected it would, which is to say it looks really really bad.

  9. #9
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    6,590

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brettc1 View Post
    Hmmmm.

    Okay, there is no doubt that the way the male characters are being shown is pretty sexist.

    On the other hand, is that the intention? By which I mean, is Finch deliberately writing them as sexist because that is exactly what they are supposed to be?

    Also, I've gotta say that ever since the scene in the Kevin Costner Robin Hood a few years back, where Maid Marion takes a good long look at Robin's naked butt under the waterfall without his knowing, I don't know that we can cry foul to much about guys doing the same thing. In fact not even as "bad", since this female shown in the comic is fully clothed. What's good for the goose really should be good for the gander when it comes to having one [a gander*, I mean].

    Didn't I see the Birds of Prey in a male strip club?

    Seems to me I would have to read the whole issue for myself before being able to make any kind of informed analysis. Selected exerts are just that - selected.



    *Aussie slang - having a gander means looking at something.
    seems like men can't take some of the reverse sexism

  10. #10
    Chad Jar Jar Pinsir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Naboo
    Posts
    5,333

    Default

    Its a Zenoscope book.....
    #InGunnITrust, #ZackSnyderistheBlueprint, #ReleasetheAyerCut

  11. #11
    Ultimate Member Sacred Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    18,725

    Default

    brett, Vanguard and I are in tandem here in agreement.

    WAT A TWIST!

  12. #12
    Incredible Member Step's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    796

    Default

    Ehhh, what Pinsir said, it's a Zenescope book, objectifying women is kind of it's thing, I'm not saying it's a good thing, but that's what they do and when you're a new comic writer trying to get into the business, you can't really pick and choose your projects, so I don't hold that against her.

    The rest, yeah, it seems pretty obvious that tribe was meant to be sexist.

  13. #13
    BANNED
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    5,422

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Hurt View Post
    That's a good point actually. They look like tribal warriors of old (and lions on top of it), so sexism is pretty natural for them.

    But besides that, this doesnt look so good, and i'm not thrilled about that witch in skimpy clothes. And in general, i dont get this in comics nowadays. Back in my day, when kids used to read comics, some semi nudity was appreciated, because it was hard to find. Now, not only do kids NOT read comics, but even if they do, they have iphones that can access the internet and find porn with just one click. So what's the point of this kind of crap, except perhaps self gratification?
    Well, on one hand, if they decided to tone this sort of thing down, I would not have some huge problem with it. Anything to bring more readers, particularly female ones, in.

    But on the other, while it exists, I enjoy it. I like seeing a well-executed female form. The fact that I can get it other places doesn't make me not enjoy it in comics. And no, that doesn't mean I actually touch myself to it, I just enjoy looking at it. At most, I might make a "yummy" noise.

  14. #14
    Incredible Member Vonter Voman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    674

    Default

    Of course it's on purpose (except for some bits), which doesn't mean it's any good. Forced feminist punchlines ruining the story. If she did that to characters that aren't related at all with the theme, imagine what she will do with WW. I expect a lot of marstonian "difference feminism".

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •