Last edited by Kieran_Frost; 05-04-2016 at 03:16 PM.
"We are Shakespeare. We are Michelangelo. We are Tchaikovsky. We are Turing. We are Mercury. We are Wilde. We are Lincoln, Lorca, Leonardo da Vinci. We are Alexander the Great. We are Fredrick the Great. We are Rustin. We are Addams. We are Marsha! Marsha Marsha Marsha! We so generous, we DeGeneres. We are Ziggy Stardust hooked to the silver screen. Controversially we are Malcolm X. We are Plato. We are Aristotle. We are RuPaul, god dammit! And yes, we are Woolf."
a) the poster said he couldn't name any COMIC characters who were LGBT.
b) regardless, Loki is not only usable he's already in the MCU films; which finds time to "ping" countless moments of str8 sexuality. And all I needed to name was one to prove my point. The MCU have no excuse. They already have the character, they just don't care about openly including LGBT characters.
Last edited by Kieran_Frost; 05-04-2016 at 03:46 PM.
"We are Shakespeare. We are Michelangelo. We are Tchaikovsky. We are Turing. We are Mercury. We are Wilde. We are Lincoln, Lorca, Leonardo da Vinci. We are Alexander the Great. We are Fredrick the Great. We are Rustin. We are Addams. We are Marsha! Marsha Marsha Marsha! We so generous, we DeGeneres. We are Ziggy Stardust hooked to the silver screen. Controversially we are Malcolm X. We are Plato. We are Aristotle. We are RuPaul, god dammit! And yes, we are Woolf."
Is that any more of a gamble with all these straight white male lead film that bomb WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYY bigger than the minority lead ones?
Last time I checked Kevin Hart films don't bomb in theaters unlike Adam Sandler films that need the oversea market to make a profit.
Oh and lets address the "forced" diversity for a moment.
Can you define it or use it in a complete sentence?
Is it when we actually have a POC in a cast? That so many Simpsons Comic Book Store guys have strokes over it?
We are not having forced diversity-we are having long overdue diversity that should have been for YEARS.
It's not my fault studios are so WEAK about offending comic book store guy that they won't expand. Because comic book store guy wants to encourage boycotts or shoot up the theater because a minority is in a film.
It's not my fault comic book store guy wants to use Catwoman, Steel & FF as examples to KEEP minorities, women & LGBT from leading films.
Then he wants to cry about why can Moon Knight get a movie? Because he doesn't understand attacking Finn, Black Johnny Storm, Panther or Black Widow HURTS guys like Moon Knight than it does Khan or Miles.
We are PAST time for a LGBT in Marvel films. That sexuality does NOT define them. A LGBT can save the world just as well as anyone else.
I don't want to hear about that is not right for a kid to see. SORRY America-if you kid goes to SCHOOL-they already see it. Or did yall not think a kid with gay parents don't go to school like the rest?
Lets get some LGBT in some films and get it over with.
Right. Pretty much all the other characters are straight on the comics, but the asexual representation have to be with the only one that it's LGBT? It's like when they talk about how the Acient One being a woman is all about diversity when they whitewashed him, they shouldn't exclude one to bring another. Were you being sarcastic or something?
Last edited by Wiccan; 05-04-2016 at 04:40 PM.
Caught red-handed. Mostly.
I do think it's a bit odd that asexuals tend to get lost in the shuffle of desiring more non-hetero representation, though.
Anyways, I was merely drawing attention to the point that Loki hasn't been expressed as straight, gay, bi or...anything (again, unless I've missed something...I STILL haven't finished watching Thor: TDW ).
You were obviously being at least a bit ironic from the beginning because for some reason you find the need to try to invalidate people's arguments and be against LGBT representation, but I have seen some people being completely serious saying a lot worst, so you never really knows .