Ed Brubaker was still going to kill off Steve Rogers and have Bucky be Captain America for a while even if Civil War didn't happen. Thatr's how he plotted it out before Civil War was even an idea.
Circumstances would be different, but he'd still be dead(ish). He was shot by a Faustused Sharon Carter, and she could just as easily have done that while he slept.
There's being willing to acknowledge mistakes, and then there's going out of your way to trash the marketing of your comic books and blockbuster film to pander to disgruntled vocal fanboys.
I don't agree with a lot of the decisions in the Civil War comic. I'm glad that thhe Marvel Cinematic Universe has done a better job at preserving the integrity of its characters.
But seriously, the comic was not a failure in mainstream terms. Its sales were successful, and the trades are stocked in bookstores to this day. On the Goodreads website, nearly 22,000 customers gave the main story a 4.05 stars (out of 5) average.
Seems like there are quite a few people who liked this story. At the very least, some of its basic ideas proved to be good source material for the new movie.
Marvel is obviously going to focus on the positive when talking about its own history. You don't see them focusing on the racism and sexism of early comics, bringing up wife beater Hank Pym, etc.
Why would they talk shit about their own product? Civil War is one of their big sellers even outside the movie, it's a popular well known storyline and the trade still sells. It makes no business movie to talk down their own product.
Civil War would have been an interesting elseworlds. Pretty horrible in-continuity though. I mean jezzus, what did they expect to do with Spider-Man after his outing? Was editorial really just like "eh, just do it and we'll just have the devil wipe it away next week"? Seems idiotic.
Also really damaged Iron Man for quite some time.
The film rocked, but it was just loosely based on the concept behind Civil War.
One More Day was conceived and planned before long Civil War was.
It's more like the writers used Civil War to make destroying the Spider-marriage more palatable to fans. Not that it worked.
Not that I see any reason why a status quo where Spider-Man's identity is publically known is problematic as long as writers choose to make that work.
Par for the course then, because the Winter Soldier and Age Of Ultron films didn't resemble the comicbook versions of that story either. They weren't even loosely based on them.The film rocked, but it was just loosely based on the concept behind Civil War.
Yep all good points, plus the main Civil War event is actually quite a good read despite the reception it always gets in places like this board. It is still selling and as far as I can tell it didn't need a reprint for the new movie because it wasn't out of print. Any Marvel trade that can stay in print is a stand out success, as marvel have a poor track record on long term trade sales.
f/k/a The Black Guardian
COEXIST | NOEXIST
ShadowcatMagikДаякѕтая Sto☈mDustMercury MonetRachelSage
MagnetoNightcrawlerColossusRockslideBeastXavier
Patsy Walker on TV! Patsy Walker in new comics! Patsy Walker in your brain! And Jessica Jones is the new Nancy! (Oh, and read the Comics Cube.)
That might be true in a fantasy world. The sole purpose of a company is to make money. Marvel/Disney is not a non-profit
entity. Besides the major stockholders that everybody loves to hate, there are millions of individual shareholders with Disney
stock in their retirement account. It's money they are depending on for survival when they can no longer work. You or your
parents might be one of these people and don't even know it. Making money doesn't sound so bad now, does it?
Obviously you don't understand the concept of "doing well by doing right". Or how about "what does it profit a man if he gain the whole world only to lose his soul?"
Of course it's not an "either/or" situation in any event. They could have chosen to do a story that didn't crap all over the characters and franchise that would have been just as good. There was nothing dictating that the only way to make money was by trashing the milieu and characters.
Considering how much Marvel had to backpedal or undo stuff caused by Civil War after a bit I've always considered that their willingness to admit their mistakes.
Reed had to get 4 stories to try to explain why he'd be Pro-Reg contrary to his history defending Mutant Rights and autonomy therein. With all but the last sounding ridiculous.
Pym was retconned to never being there.
Tony eventually mindwiped himself largely due to other circumstances but essentially the one big change was he no longer remembered Civil War (wonder why).
I think the only reason Civil War did so well sales wise was everyone was pumped to see Cap stomp Tony and then when Tony won everyone suddenly had a morbid wondering as to how this'd work.
All that and tie-ins that made Tony look ever more like a mustache twirling villain and set many up to pretty much not like Tony or Maria Hill ever again (well OK never's long but a good while).