Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7891011
Results 151 to 153 of 153
  1. #151
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,558

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StrikeJP View Post
    Same reason a stealthy Batman wears a yellow oval. Just have to roll with it sometimes.
    But if I understood it well, SuperDad wanted to keep his own existence a secret. I mean, nobody should ever know that he exists, not even criminals. Is that right?

  2. #152
    Spectacular Member StrikeJP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    141

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Myskin View Post
    But if I understood it well, SuperDad wanted to keep his own existence a secret. I mean, nobody should ever know that he exists, not even criminals. Is that right?
    That's correct. I'm not disagreeing with you that his "stealth suit" doesn't make sense. In theory, he could wear his red/blue/yellow suit, move at super-speed and still never be seen.

    Clark Kent doesn't want people to know he's Superman, but all he has is a pair of glasses. Like I said, sometimes you just have to roll with stuff for "comic reasons."

  3. #153
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,558

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StrikeJP View Post
    That's correct. I'm not disagreeing with you that his "stealth suit" doesn't make sense. In theory, he could wear his red/blue/yellow suit, move at super-speed and still never be seen.

    Clark Kent doesn't want people to know he's Superman, but all he has is a pair of glasses. Like I said, sometimes you just have to roll with stuff for "comic reasons."
    Seriously, maybe I am just tired of entire decades of poor quality comic books, but I really can't find it acceptable that comics writers are still trying to sell cheap ideas as if the concept of superheroes hadn't evolved a bit since the 1950s.

    Clark Kent's disguise was conceived in the 1930s, when comics were infinitely more naive and unsophisticated. We (generally) accept it because it is considered an iconic element of the character, but that doesn't mean that it doesn't cause lots of trouble in terms of credibility. Especially as far as Lois is concerned: the fact that she isn't able to see through the disguise still makes her appear as an idiot, quite frankly. That's why in lots of contemporary adaptation she discovers Clark's identity first, or she consciously wants to keep it secret. But - if Superman was created today - I seriously doubt that they could really sell the idea that a pair of glasses is ALWAYS enough to conceal Supes' ID among his fellow journalists.

    Well, unless Jurgens writes him, apparently. I mean, the Lois & Clark series was created in 2010s. If they want to give him a freakin' black costume with a giant silver S, it's fine, but Jurgens should justify it somehow. I don't know HOW, but for God's sake, Jurgens was the one who came up with the idea, come on. At least he shouldn't implement in the same series two concepts which completely contradict each other.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •