Is she not supposed to or does she not?Originally Posted by Agent Z
Logan under Claremont really is that Clint Eastwood type of macho man, but with depth wrought from a long history of suffering and an attempt to stifle that animalistic rage with a more zen, detached master sort of thing.
Sure, X23 can vacillate between complete savagery and trying to be better, but that goes for any and all characters in this medium. Especially at the movie level, there is no way the audience will respond to her the same way they responded to him.
She is derivative, literally, while not occupying that same niche. I really don't understand her appeal or the notion that she is a good idea to replace him.
Results 1 to 15 of 10013
Threaded View
-
06-25-2016, 02:38 PM #11Namaste
- Join Date
- Apr 2014
- Posts
- 12,605
Let the flames destroy all but that which is pure and true!
Reply With Quote
