From what I can tell, post AvX X-Men will go down in history as a Dark Age for X-Men alongside the midto-late 90s.
I certainly hear less discussion and zero praise for it compared to Krakoa.
Sales have been slowly falling ever since M-Day when Marvel decided all the mutants had to be herded up and thrown in their own little ghetto corner of the Marvel Universe. This is also about the time the whole "if your a mutant it doesn't matter how evil you are or were we are all family" garbage started. Marvel then doubled down with the Utopia era then tripled downed with the Krakoa era. Working along side such totally evil bastards as Sinister, Apocalypse, Shaw, Mystique, and all the rest? That left such a sour taste in many long time fans mouths you are never going to get them back. About the only way to excuse that level of character assasination is if Marvel would reveal that Xavier has been influencing all the good mutants all along to keep them accepting living and working with the villains.
People say X-Men has the best female characters at Marvel and in terms of diversity sure, but in terms of actual writing I just don't see it.
Jean spent a good chunk of her publication history dead and she has become the poster child of comic characters dying and coming back to life. Not to mention her most famous story basically being "woman going crazy with power".
Storm is said to be a goddess, an omega level mutant, a master thief and hand to hand combatant and a great leader yet aside from Claremont and Ewing most writers use her as the lightning lass in the background. It's hilarious that some of her most beloved moments in recent history came from Coates' BP run, a run that's beyond the direct influence of x-office and a run that's actively disliked by BP fans.
I'm not gonna touch the whole Kwannon/Betsy thing. All I'm gonna say is that I'm happy both have their distinct identity now though Betsy as Captain Britain was kinda boring. But Hellions was great.
Mystique, Selene etc. can be neatly summarized as bad *****es which some people love as a character archetype but gets boring in the long run. Emma Frost used to belong solely to this group before being allowed to grow.
Speaking of Emma, she is mostly fine aside from her time in IvX, now that was something.
Kitty/Kate and Rogue are written well for most of their history I'd say.
There are others like Polaris, Magik etc. but these are the ones I'd consider as A-list x-ladies. I honestly don't see what makes them above the likes of She-Hulk or Invisible Woman.
Last edited by Doom'nGloom; Yesterday at 02:33 PM.
Some people equate "girlboss" moments with being a good character. You see many of their fans talk about how powerful they are or how they are "mother" because they barely have anything else in terms of depth.
It's not like you can't have She-Hulk without the Hulk. Both John Byrne and Dan Slott's runs are beloved by the fans. While Reed usually dominates F4 stories, both John Byrne and especially Jonathan Hickman used Sue pretty well. By the way I didn't give Jen and Sue as specific examples. I'm asking what seperates the x-ladies from the many other heroines of marvel.
A) I don’t really see it as a competition.
B) I find it to the quantity of well-written female characters the franchise has produced. Most superhero teams struggle to have more than 2 female characters on the roster. The X-Men has a whole deck you can easily pull from.
C) Looking at your specific examples, I’ll agree that these characters haven’t all had consistently good writing, but I find that to be the case w/ most comic book characters with a 50-60 year history. It’s always important to view the overall comic book landscape in which some of these women were created/ came into prominence. Storm as both a powerhouse and leader of her team was unheard of and she explicitly wasn’t designed to be a love interest for any of her teammates. Jean getting to cosmic levels of power and having THE iconic self-sacrifice is comic book history. Betsy pre-ninja had such an interesting balance between not being the “strongest” character but still craving to be part of the action and hold her own. Rogue had complex moral and psychological struggles. The New Mutants alone introduced several 3 dimensional young women.
Again some writers are able to capture the brilliance of these characters and some aren’t. Some are able to bring new complexity and depth to them like Emma’s growth in the 90s and 2000s, or Kwannon in Hellions. I don’t think that’s a slight on great characters like Sue and Jen, it’s just that X-fans have a TON of female characters they can point to as their favorites.
Last edited by Kingdom X; Yesterday at 03:21 PM.
"The Marvel EIC Chair has a certain curse that goes along with it: it tends to drive people insane, and ultimately, out of the business altogether. It is the notorious last stop for many staffers, as once you've sat in The Big Chair, your pariah status is usually locked in." Christopher Priest
I agree it's more of a matter of quantity. However I've seen many times people saying, both here and other places on the internet, that x-men has the best female characters of marvel and when I compare them with other prominent female characters of marvel I don't see much difference. Maybe because I'm young enough to miss the many Dark Phoenix Saga's or Lifedeath's and can only look back at them through modern filters. Speaking of today, X-men has more high profile female characters but that's to be expected in a franchise where characters struggle for appearances even in 5-6 different titles in a month.