Oh, you mean the history they retconned in to try and change Apocalypse around? Where before he didn’t have any of that? And that despite saving humanity he still latter tried to kill 90% or at least a majority of it? Multiple times? Are we all operating under the rules that if you save the planet one it gives you a free ticket to commit genocide? Yo, someone get Red Skull on the phone.
As for the god stuff, yes, why not, let’s have the mutants make even more enemies why not. Hercules and goddamn Thor are in agreement with Ares that what Gorgon did to Phobos was fucked up and they’d help him get revenge. Probably wouldn’t have any issue with Krakoa outside of that. Or the various Asian groups that hate him for trying to kill several cities…the groups he helped kill for the Hand, Hydra, etc.
As for this "Looking At The Books Seriously..." business -
Anything that was actually like that would have to account for the reality that Krakoa's reputation being ruined when an assassination attempt on three of it's Council members resulted in a Krakoan Captain not executing those assassins when it would be completely justifiable seems rather laughable.
And, that's being charitable.
I give up. The X-men community’s obsession with justifying Krakoa parading around someone who was unrepentant about trying to destroy the majority of intelligent life on earth multiple times can join the Chuck Austen run in weird, unexplainable crap. By sheer body count alone, Apocalypse would have been worse than Hitler. Unless you think having Hitler as a diplomat is a good thing, then no, having Alocalypse there or even in the public eye is stupid.
You do realize that there is an Alocalypse that exists before Krakoa, and that people like actions to be held accountable for, and oh why am I even bothering. Okay, screw if, if we are doing this, we go full hog. Marvel should go ahead, pull the trigger, and make the Red Skull a good guy. Retcon in a tragic backstory, have him start doing heroic things. Have that play out.
Okay, we’re done. I’ve frequently stated I’ve been talking about his earlier actions, and all you do is go on and on about what he has done in Krakoa like a broken record as if that’s the only thing the character did that matters. Apocalypse has never really shown regret for a lot of what he has done, got himself into his current situation by manipulating people behind the scenes, and gets treated like a hero despite repeatedly attempting genocide with no regrets. But sure, he did something kinda nice. Once. I’m sure Hitler pet a puppy a few times too.
You two guys made me realise one (of the many) weirdness of this K-era. Not necessary a bad thing but a sore incongruity: tha this Apocalypse does not seem the same person we saw in past. Of all the "irredeemable" bad guys that joined that endless party that is krakoa society Apocalypse is the one that seem out of nowhere completely different every time we see him, as literally every appearance eof his seem a different personality.
To the point that briefly I almost thought that was Evan/genesis cosplaying as big A. But is not the case. Still. Somethings is off with Apoc characterization.
I’m sure we’ll get more Apocalypse-did-nothing-wrong retcons in Judgement day to explain away the Eternals’ beef with him