Originally Posted by
Grunty
Wouldn't that have required her to be the responcibility of the X-office, rather than being an independent character who just happens to get the "mutant" origin for her super powers, which is what she would have likely been?
Being a mutant does not mean a character has to be the involved in the X-men line of comics after all. It's just the source of their powers. Or at least it used to.
Considering all those once existing minor characters with mutant as quick cheap origin for their super powers, which Joe Q. was seemingly so annoyed about, were seldomly ever the responcibility of the X-editorial unless they were created for or used by the X-men line of comics, i don't see how this should have been the case for Khamala either if she had been created in a time where the Marvel higher ups weren't actively trying to replace mutants with inhumans over movie rights.
She would have been like Molly Hayes in Runaways. Perhaps the X-men would have guest appeared for an issue, but then things would remain independent as usual.
I kinda wish we could go back to those times.