I think in some to many ways, Storm has become a prisoner of her iconography, and everything she represents.
I think Cyclops is boring in the same way Captain America is boring, but it doesn't make either boring to read. They just aren't exciting personalities, probably partially because of who they are and what they represent meaning they're under a ton of constant pressure to be calm, rational, measured, etc. That's why I thought mutant revolutionary Cyclops was an organic next step for the character.
Right, but not all of them have the public title "Leader of the X-Men." Except Storm (and now Kitty). If the team is supposed to be the shining example of mutants as a positive force for good in the world, Cyclops has to be the most perfect example of that as a figurehead.
Well, I think these days creators are pretty apprehensive about doing anything too dramatic and/or drastic with her, for... reasons. And I also think moderate to casual fans, have been conditioned to shy away from engaging in most conversations involving her, due to some unending, eXtreme posturing by a vocally aggressive contingent of her fanbase. With them, it seems to be more about Storm the infallible feats machine, and less about Ororo the flawed, multifaceted character. Hence why she's often labeled as boring, and complained about as just being... there. Most the time, only the surface qualities of Storm get any play in the modern day, and even then... it's usually done in a decidedly superficial way.
X-Force and Uncanny X-Force (Wolverine's killing squads basically) are generaññy well regarded tittles for most of the fanbase, The Dark Angel Saga by Remender in particular, but some people still prefer Cable as the leader (nothing wrong with of course is just a difference of opinion), i found Logan's tennure far more interesting than anything that Nathan did with that group. Logan leading a buch of people as damagrd and dysfuntional as him, was a lot of fun.
To add to the Storm conversation: the latest, most interesting thing about her character is the fact that she’s not comfortable and might actually resent with the school aspect of Xavier’s Dream methodology.
I’d love to read a more thorough examination of this characterization, as it puts her in opposition to the standard cookie cutter expectations of X-Men.
Whereabouts has this been hit upon? It seems like they've always portrayed her as being one of the biggest proponents of Xavier's ideology in all respects, right up there with Jean & Cyke/Kurt & Kitty. So is it just the school bit she's possibly developing a distaste for, or the Professor's whole peaceful coeXistence mantra altogether?
It’s from the recent “Should the X-Men be teachers” thread still on the front page. I’m on a phone right now or I’d supply links to the first mention. Anyway, it was yogaflame’s assertion from how she was written by Claremont in X-Treme X-Men v1... specifically during the Schism arc of that series. I’m sure it was primarily written to separate the tone, goals, and intention of both books.
In any case, like you I assumed Storm would be a good student of Xavier’s and fully support his school as an extension of his dream... but it’s VERY interesting if she’s instead having her own unique perspective regarding his ideology versus methodology.
I don’t think she’s written that way for all the reasons you list, but given the time and author of XXM, it’s compelling. Storm having a unique opinion among the X-Men of the X-Men mission can only be a good thing for her character. No?