Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 98
  1. #31
    All-New Member stevetrevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    14

    Default

    What an awesome memory with your dad! When I saw BvsS in the theater, when WW comes on screen, the audience clapped, and I was pleasantly surprised!

    Quote Originally Posted by dittobeetle View Post
    It's likely a sign of my age that I don't understand why younger audiences today don't respond to Superman: the Movie. I saw it in 1978, during Christmas with my dad, and when he saved Lois and the helicopter the whole audience stood up to cheer. Nothing like that will ever happen nowadays. I guess when you get old you stop caring that tights don't look like realistic alien garb, and you care more about whether you actually like the movie's protagonist. Old man raving aside, I guess I don't get why it would've been difficult for Z. Snyder to create a Superman who actually cared about helping people. Geez, Ruffalo's Banner is more of a hero than Cavill's Clark, because he's stricken with guilt after going on a rampage. In Man of Steel, Clark never even acknowledges the damage.

    With respect to what's come after it, as the years pass, Superman Returns looks better and better.

  2. #32
    Fantastic Member justinslot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    360

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doctor Know View Post
    Are you offering the scene where Superman fails to save a room full of people from an explosion--something even Snyderman could do, or at least save most of them--and then just stands there and looks vaguely upset afterwards as a defense of the character? It's the worst scene in BvS. God, for the days where "Superman would never go away for five years" was the best example of a movie Superman acting un-Supermanny...

    Anyway, Superman Returns: I love it, it's the only film that has Clark and Lois acting like adults with adult issues. I've also admired how James Marsden's character doesn't turn out to be a villain or a terrible person, which would be the easy path for this movie to take.

  3. #33
    Extraordinary Member Doctor Know's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    5,545

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by simbob4000 View Post



    Those are very funny gifs you posted, funnier if you remember the stupid scenes they're part.


    Quote Originally Posted by justinslot View Post
    Are you offering the scene where Superman fails to save a room full of people from an explosion--something even Snyderman could do, or at least save most of them--and then just stands there and looks vaguely upset afterwards as a defense of the character? It's the worst scene in BvS. God, for the days where "Superman would never go away for five years" was the best example of a movie Superman acting un-Supermanny...
    Superman fails to save those people because Lex Luthor used a victim from the Kryptonian Invasion as a Trojan Horse to murder innocent people. Luthor has always been a crooked individual, and this scene demonstrates that. Keep in mind Superman went to Capitol Hill to address his actions across the world and meet the man in the chair. Senator Finch asked, and Superman complied. Because it was the right thing to do, to assuage fears and concerns about him, and Luthor took advantage of that.



    Casual reminder that Captain America also failed to notice a bomb on Crossbones, before it detonates. Cap himself, several Avengers and scores of people would've been killed had Scarlet Witch not contained the explosion. However, SW sent the exploding Crossbones into a building and killed a dozen or so Wakandans regardless. The point in both BvS and CACW is that villains will do any and everything to hurt, kill and maim heroes and the civilian population. I thought we all understood this.





    Quote Originally Posted by simbob4000 View Post
    Does pathos mean something different now?
    Pathos means suffering. Also the root of Pathos is 'path'. We get the words sympathy and empathy from Pathos.

  4. #34
    Amazing Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    35

    Default

    I'd add as reason 11 to revisit: the "old lady" Lex bilks out of her fortune is Noel Neill, the first on-screen Lois Lane. Loved that. And I've always enjoyed the film despite it's somewhat subdued tone. I liked the film's honest attempt to get inside the emotions of the characters. Although I wouldn't have minded if they'd thrown in a giant robot or two on the rampage.

  5. #35
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    451

    Default

    only thing good about Superman Returns is the Special effects and Spacey's portrayal of lex luthor. otherwise its the worst superman movie ever. people may not like the snyder version of superman but at least Cavill has more lines and more acting experience then Routh did.
    Last edited by AndrewBatman82; 06-26-2016 at 02:28 PM.

  6. #36
    Fantastic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    385

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by justinslot View Post
    Are you offering the scene where Superman fails to save a room full of people from an explosion--something even Snyderman could do, or at least save most of them--and then just stands there and looks vaguely upset afterwards as a defense of the character? It's the worst scene in BvS. God, for the days where "Superman would never go away for five years" was the best example of a movie Superman acting un-Supermanny...

    Anyway, Superman Returns: I love it, it's the only film that has Clark and Lois acting like adults with adult issues. I've also admired how James Marsden's character doesn't turn out to be a villain or a terrible person, which would be the easy path for this movie to take.
    to supes defense: do you really think anybody suspected the bomb in wheelchair? and once it exploded there was very little he could do to save them.

  7. #37
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    451

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LordLeviathan View Post
    to supes defense: do you really think anybody suspected the bomb in wheelchair? and once it exploded there was very little he could do to save them.
    it was covered in lead thats why superman couldn't see any danger

  8. #38
    Astonishing Member Arfguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    4,260

    Default

    I really like Superman Returns for a lot of reason. This was a true follow-up to Superman and Superman II. I really loved Brendan Routh as Clark Kent and Superman. There are parts in this movie that are just beautifully done. Routh really nails the character. It's really too bad that he didn't get to portray the character in another movie.
    Find me on Instagram and Twitter - @arfguy
    https://whoaskd.com/

  9. #39
    Mighty Member Calighoula's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,967

    Default

    People still expect Superman to reverse time by flying at hyperspeeds. And ridiculous, er, fantastical stuff like that. That's why they can't accept that a lead-lined compartment concealed a bomb — because, you know, Superman can't see through lead.

  10. #40
    All-New Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    2

    Default

    yeah, the plot. it was, "lets raise a bunch of rocks out of the ocean," it just made for an ugly and colorless movie. i liked routh, and it still pulled $400 mil, they shoulda kept going, they'd be so much more on the ball now! DC needs to get some humor in their movies, stat! they have such an amazing decades-long stash of crazy superhero teams and whacked vigilantes.. Lobo should be able to blow Deadpool out of the water, if done right.

  11. #41
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    6,457

    Default

    Superman Returns isn't even in serious running for "one of the worst superhero movies ever." It certainly has some major flaws, but even most of those weren't necessarily of the crippling variety. It's understandable why hardcore fans who'd been waiting decades for a new Superman movie might have bristled at what Returns offered but, at the same time, most of what the movie did offer it handled pretty well, even if it wasn't necesarily what the audience wanted. It was a highly polarizing and divisive movie with a number of questionable creative choices and paths taken by Singer. But it was not, in the main a poorly made movie at all.

  12. #42
    Amazing Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    41

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doctor Know View Post
    Superman fails to save those people because Lex Luthor used a victim from the Kryptonian Invasion as a Trojan Horse to murder innocent people. Luthor has always been a crooked individual, and this scene demonstrates that. Keep in mind Superman went to Capitol Hill to address his actions across the world and meet the man in the chair. Senator Finch asked, and Superman complied. Because it was the right thing to do, to assuage fears and concerns about him, and Luthor took advantage of that.



    Casual reminder that Captain America also failed to notice a bomb on Crossbones, before it detonates. Cap himself, several Avengers and scores of people would've been killed had Scarlet Witch not contained the explosion. However, SW sent the exploding Crossbones into a building and killed a dozen or so Wakandans regardless. The point in both BvS and CACW is that villains will do any and everything to hurt, kill and maim heroes and the civilian population. I thought we all understood this.







    Pathos means suffering. Also the root of Pathos is 'path'. We get the words sympathy and empathy from Pathos.
    Actually in the extended version Superman DID save survivors in that explosion in the Capitol building. It happened. Plus, the people in that burning room were already extra crispy. ;P He failed to save them because the bomb was wrapped in lead so he couldn't see and seriously even Superman wouldn't have expected someone to blow up the place.

  13. #43
    BANNED
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    216

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LordLeviathan View Post
    to supes defense: do you really think anybody suspected the bomb in wheelchair? and once it exploded there was very little he could do to save them.
    Quicksilver saved an entire school full of people from an explosion. QS>>>> Snyderman

    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewBatman82 View Post
    it was covered in lead thats why superman couldn't see any danger
    Where was any of that explained within the current continuity of the DCCU? I don't recall any bits in either MoS or BvS where his inability to see through lead is explained, how Luthor would be privy to that knowledge, or that lead was actually added to the wheelchair for that express purpose? All it comes off as is reaching for explanations for poor storytelling. In film it's supposed to be "show don't tell", but at some point relevant info should be either shown, told, or both. All the above is relevant info and should be explained at some point in the context of one of the two movies, at least if the filmmakers don't want Superman to come off as incompetent or lazy (super speed + super senses + angry mob outside + today's socio-political environment = a responsible Superman would have taken the .0001 of a second to X-ray the courtroom, realized he couldn't see through the wheelchair, examined it with his other senses and taken action to avert the crisis).

  14. #44
    Fantastic Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    319

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LordLeviathan View Post
    to supes defense: do you really think anybody suspected the bomb in wheelchair?
    Yes. Literally anybody could have seen that coming. Even the TSA knows to check wheelchairs for explosives.
    TeekVids <-- Check out the news every Sunday

  15. #45
    BANNED
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,149

    Default

    I remember i didn't see it in theaters because it had the feel of a movie that was made to be a quick cash in on the super hero movie craze.

    I had the same feeling about the Green Lantern movie and Fantastic Four 1 & 2. which i also didn't see.

    It's just that when i saw the trailer for Superman Returns it just didn't excite me, it just left me feeling "meh."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •