That conversation didn't occur in enough time for Batman to run off, find the spear, retrieve it, and hand it over to Diana. Certainly not if they're going to have a similar-length conversation in which Diana details her origins. That doesn't even cover that fact that even if Batman ran off to get the spear right away, he would've found it wasn't where he left it. And then he would've been standing in the middle of a building that was about to be destroyed by Doomsday's eruption.
And Batman didn't just stand around. He distracted Doomsday for a while and it was his Kryptonite grenade that weakened Doomsday enough for Clark to stab him with the spear. Batman did what Batman should have done: he bided his time and waited for the opportunity to strike with the one useful weapon he had. Once he saw the building with the spear was destroyed, he had every reason to believe that the spear was a lost cause.
Maybe she was supposed to land the killing blow at first. Then somewhere along the line, the decision was made that this was supposed to be a Death of Superman movie and that plan was changed. Whether that was a good decision or not isn't really relevant anymore. What's done is done.Yeah no kidding, hence it being concept art, and wasn't my point. The concept art with her having a spear appeared long before the movie came out, so it wouldn't have been shocking to anyone if it was Diana who did end up using the Kryptonite Spear and not Clark. My point was maybe she WAS supposed to be the one to deliver the killing blow. Or maybe not. Ether way it would have made more sense for her to be the one to do it.
And it would only have made more sense for Diana to deliver the killing blow if the plan was not to kill Superman at the end of the movie. If they didn't want Clark to die, they probably would've done something more like what you describe. Just like if they didn't want Superman to kill Zod in MOS, they would've let there be one last Phantom Drive lying around to allow Clark to send him back to the Phantom Zone.
They've had crazy synergy in previous continuities. It's just as easy to say that they won't have that in this universe. They may actually have to develop their synergy over time.My point is they have crazy synergy. Things just fall into place when they are on the same wavelength, this movie was supposed to show the beginning of this, and its debateable whether they succeeded in it.
I'm saying he'd have severe doubts that this tiny rope will do anything to contain Doomsday. He may not argue with her, but he may just drop the Lasso and decide to go after Doomsday with his fists. Or he may simply hesitate to act too long and miss the window to be relevant. It's asking a lot of him to just trust that this unremarkable-looking rope will be any kind of useful against a creature that's taken his best punches and kept coming.So you're saying he would have sat there arguing with her instead of listening to her? The one constant in Diana's history is that the Lasso is indestructible. Even the regular moviegoer/fan knows it's an indestructible gold rope. Now if the truth/control abilities are within the lasso itself or a conduit that Diana uses, well that's changed, its elasticity and being indestructible it hasn't.
We know the Lasso is indestructible. The audience knows it's indestructible. Superman, however, does not know that. And it's no easy feat convincing him to just take a completely blind leap of faith that this rope can just defy everything he knows about physics.
The Lasso was glowing when Diana used it on Doomsday. When she lost her grip, the glow went away. It's not unreasonable to assume that the glow may have had something to do with Doomsday's inability to escape the Lasso right away. And if it only ever glowed in Diana's hands, it's possible that it only works that way when in her hands. We won't know for certain until next year.