Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 41 of 41
  1. #31
    Astonishing Member Francisco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    2,068

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carabas View Post
    Yyyes you did. Well, you said that Super-editorial only promotes Bat-characters.



    Clearly you have not even been reading my posts.
    For whatever reason I thought that by super-editorial you meant DC in general. What I mean is that those in charge of the superman franchise (super office) doesn't do the work needed to promote the Superman related characters and Superman himself. They don't even protect them from been misused. the bat office won't feature Superman in any significative way in the bat books but Batman is constantly shoved down our throats in the Superbooks.
    "By force of will he turns his gaze upon the seething horror bellow us on the hillside.
    Yes, he feels the icy touch of fear, but he is not cowed. He is Superman!"

  2. #32
    Astonishing Member RobinFan4880's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    4,883

    Default

    Mercy is a generic body guard/secretary. Harley Quinn is an audacious, interesting, complex character.

    There's no surprise why one took off and the other did not.

  3. #33
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    18,566

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RobinFan4880 View Post
    Mercy is a generic body guard/secretary.
    A renegade Amazon isn't a generic anything. Well, unles somebody messes up and turns her into one.

  4. #34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carabas View Post
    A renegade Amazon isn't a generic anything. Well, unles somebody messes up and turns her into one.
    What episode of S:TAS revealed her to be a renegade Amazon? Oh, that's right, there wasn't one, because she's not. She's a generic bodyguard/personal assistant with no personality to speak of because that's what she was meant to be. Introducing a character based on her into the comics, except this time she's a renegade Amazon, isn't going to really change that. Or whatever the hell else was done elsewhere (cyborg? Really?).

    With respect to the OP, I think he just projected onto the character what he wanted her to be instead of saw what was actually there.

  5. #35
    Legendary Member daBronzeBomma's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Usually at the End of Time
    Posts
    4,598

    Default

    Ah, the old question:



    Why did the Joker-henchwoman surpass the Luthor-henchwoman?

    You have to remember who created both characters: Paul Dini and Bruce Timm.

    Dini/Timm ... let's call that tandem "Dimm" ... clearly loved their version of the Batverse, and had a special affection for their creation Harley Quinn. Dimm were able to use their influence to bring that character intact to the printed pages of DC.

    Contrast that passion Dim had for Harley Quinn and the Batverse with their relative indifference to Mercy Graves and the Superverse. The S:TAS cartoon was never anything more than a paycheck to them.

    Consequently, Mercy had no patron saint to guide her introduction to the printed pages of DC. Hence her multiple disparate incarnations (bodyguard, amazon, cyborg) that fluctuate wildly and never gain traction. Contrast that with consistency of Harley, no matter what her costume looks like.
    Last edited by daBronzeBomma; 08-02-2016 at 06:02 AM.

  6. #36
    Incredible Member Kolimar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    512

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Timber Wolf-By-Night View Post
    What episode of S:TAS revealed her to be a renegade Amazon? Oh, that's right, there wasn't one, because she's not. She's a generic bodyguard/personal assistant with no personality to speak of because that's what she was meant to be. Introducing a character based on her into the comics, except this time she's a renegade Amazon, isn't going to really change that. Or whatever the hell else was done elsewhere (cyborg? Really?).

    With respect to the OP, I think he just projected onto the character what he wanted her to be instead of saw what was actually there.
    This. Plus Harley was designed to be inherently more interesting. She's in love with the Joker. She's insane. She's funny. She's silly. Her fashion sense is highly questionable. And she's in love with the Joker.

  7. #37
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    18,566

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kolimar View Post
    And she's in love with the Joker.
    Well, not anymore. And it made her instantly much more interesting to me.

  8. #38
    Mighty Member 13th Superman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,032

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kolimar View Post
    This. Plus Harley was designed to be inherently more interesting. She's in love with the Joker. She's insane. She's funny. She's silly. Her fashion sense is highly questionable. And she's in love with the Joker.
    This pretty much sums it up. Personally I like the Amazon version with Hope and the New 52 one a close second. There could be an interesting back story with the former. A disgraced Amazon or a daughter of one. Heck maybe a meta human.

  9. #39
    Incredible Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    853

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by daBronzeBomma View Post
    Ah, the old question:



    Why did the Joker-henchwoman surpass the Luthor-henchwoman?

    You have to remember who created both characters: Paul Dini and Bruce Timm.

    Dini/Timm ... let's call that tandem "Dimm" ... clearly loved their version of the Batverse, and had a special affection for their creation Harley Quinn. Dimm were able to use their influence to bring that character intact to the printed pages of DC.

    Contrast that passion Dim had for Harley Quinn and the Batverse with their relative indifference to Mercy Graves and the Superverse. The S:TAS cartoon was never anything more than a paycheck to them.

    Consequently, Mercy had no patron saint to guide her introduction to the printed pages of DC. Hence her multiple disparate incarnations (bodyguard, amazon, cyborg) that fluctuate wildly and never gain traction. Contrast that with consistency of Harley, no matter what her costume looks like.
    A bit harsh but I think animated Superman was competently executed but fairly bland compared to BTAS. My favorite Superman comics are, well... More flavorful and weird. BTAS did faithful adaptations of the best stories with an artsy deco/noir style. I always felt Superman never got the fair equivalent. The McDuffie and Dorkin episodes were better.

  10. #40
    All-New Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    15

    Default

    Mercy is great. But part of what makes her great is her loyalty to Lex Luthor, which means she will never step out of his shadow enough to be a breakout character.

    I think she works better as a human, with no Amazonian or Cyborg stuff going on. And I like Hope (preferred her before she started feeding information to Lois), because a pair of tall, powerful, dominant women is more fun than just one.

    Not every character needs to be the star. We don't have Perry White comics, do we?

  11. #41
    Phantom Zone Escapee manofsteel1979's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Planet Houston
    Posts
    5,360

    Default

    I wished the New 52 had brought in a version of Mercy similar to the Tess Mercer character from SMALLVILLE. Actually,if DC was hell bent on not having Lois be Superman's love interest then,it might have been interesting to play with the idea of a Mercy/Superman relationship for a little while. Maybe something similar to the flirtatious yet adversarial relationship Batman has with Catwoman. It would have been a different type of pairing if they were determined to shake things up some.

    Anyhow,i have to agree here with those that the reason Mercy isn't as popular is because aside from the Tess Mercer reinvention on SMALLVILLE, she just isn't an interesting character. Everyone here knows I sometimes don the tin foil hat when it comes to DC's seeming mistreatment of the Superman franchise,but not everything is a conspiracy to undermine Superman. Sometimes a character just doesn't have legs.They did attempt to make her pretty prominent in the early 2000s. I was reading then and I just don't recall there was much of a clamoring from the readers for her in the same way Batman readers seemed to like Harley. If there was they would just have done more with her and Hope.
    Last edited by manofsteel1979; 08-07-2016 at 07:32 AM.
    When it comes to comics,one person's "fan-service" is another persons personal cannon. So by definition it's ALL fan service. Aren't we ALL fans?
    SUPERMAN is the greatest fictional character ever created.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •