I am so curious as to the reaction of DC:Rebirth from Alan Moore creator of the Watchmen along with Zack Synder's reaction, who would take it as a dig on them or should either party take it as such?
I am so curious as to the reaction of DC:Rebirth from Alan Moore creator of the Watchmen along with Zack Synder's reaction, who would take it as a dig on them or should either party take it as such?
Be yourself everyone is taken !! I'm an X-Man trapped in the DC omniverse
Here's your answer from an (OLD) interview with Alan Moore: "We were talking about the future of the Watchmen characters. We had been assured that we would be the only people writing them, that they wouldn’t be handed to other creators just to make a fast buck out of a spin-off series. "
-
"At the end of the day, if they haven’t got any properties that are valuable enough, but they have got these ‘top-flight industry creators’ that are ready to produce these prequels and sequels to Watchmen, well this is probably a radical idea, but could they not get one of the ‘top-flight industry creators’ to come up with an idea of their own? Why are DC Comics trying to exploit a comic book that I wrote 25 years ago if they have got anything? Sure they ought to have had an equivalent idea since?"
Source: http://www.themarysue.com/alan-moore...mics-watchmen/
As for Zack Synder, he'd probably just praise it like every other fan and tell you to go see his movies.
Alan Moore would laugh and shake his head in disgust.
Zack Snyder would promote the latest products from Warner Bros/DC Comics.
I don't want to know. If Moore said something nice, I'd assume he'd been cloned by aliens.
"People look at us and see the poor and the mad, but they’re looking at us through the bar of their cages.
There’s a palace in your head, boy.
Learn to live in it always. " -- Grant Morrison
"Needs more Mntn Dew" - Zack Snyder, probably
"Get off my lawn!" - Alan Moore, probably
I'm actually curious on your own reaction.
Nothing wrong with using existing characters, of course.
Practically all DC's present business depends on it. And massive majority of writers, including Alan Moore, do it from time to time...and it can clearly be a wonderful story telling telling aid.
But..for me...DC has gone way too far down this route. It's become an unwieldy disruptive prop rather than a useful aid. They have put character after character into the story telling mix...seeming to believe that big events and "charismatic" characters are more important than writing quality.
No doubt it will sell a few more comics. But I'm far from convinced it helps DC creative standing.
Last edited by JackDaw; 07-30-2016 at 10:15 PM.
I think both of them are, in very different ways, far beyond caring one iota about DC comics' latest relaunch.
As of now:
All-Star Batman, Batman, Doom Patrol, The Flash, The Fix, The Flintstones, Green Valley, Hadrian's Wall, The Hellblazer, Moonshine, New Super-Man, Suicide Squad, Superman, 'Tec, Unfollow
I imagine the reason creators don't create more original characters for either of the big 2 is because of ownership and $$$ (which is a lesson I imagine Moore learned a long time ago, himself). I mean, once said writer moves on to a different project, any decisions regarding the character or (for the most part) $$$ to be made from it is left with said previous project. Honestly, if I was a freelance writer in this field, I would probably just write for these two corporate juggernauts to pay the bills or work on characters I've loved since childhood, but keep any really good ideas for characters for myself. I imagine Mark Millar is making a killing, himself, right now.