Very well said. Although I think the sad truth is that people like to make issues of gender and race all about them and not about the issues. This is why the "I am not racist, sexist, etc" is so cringeworthy, because all of a sudden we are talking about that person and their own sense of what should be done. Any criticism of that stance is forced into the personal. The individual can twist and pivot and claim all sorts of things as long as they cling to the assertion that they are not the bad guy. Suddenly we should ignore all of the facts and instead focus on one person's perspective of what the publishing strategy is, and how personally affronted they are by these subjective collections of facts and assertions.
In other words the protesters seem to be upset by their own subjective viewpoint. It is self reflective and out of proportion to the external cause. Marvel have not set out to offend them, their own reaction to Marvel's output has made them feel emotional but they would rather blame that emotional reaction on the external stimulus than self reflect. Any self reflective analyst would recognise that there is no single strategy at Marvel, and that they may be cherry picking the facts to make their assertions and ignoring the ones that contradict them. Anything to avoid the idea that their own conservatism may be based on a position of past privilege.
The best part is Marvel are leaning into the bend. The more headlines and social media outrage they get the more they push the buttons of the vocal offended. They have done this with the X-Men debate, their position on the Fantastic Four, and the issue of legacy. It is quite delightful when you realise that those that self identifify as being affronted or persecuted are actually being teased. Anyone that has studied the history of Marvel would know they have hardly ever been accused of being conservative, indeed those accusations are usually made during unsuccessful periods.
Who exactly is it that's not certain that War Machine/Rhodey isn't coming back Why are you certain he's not coming back? Oh wait let me guess because "my favorite character Synch from a niche X-book back in the 90's hasn't come back yet!! or wait even better yet "Black Goliath still hasn't come back yet!!"
He's got a lot more cache to his name then some of the names that I usually see bandied about on here (which honestly really isn't saying too much) so not really sure why there's a question as to whether he's coming back. Now whether or not he comes back fast enough satiate any one given persons timetable is up for debate but I find it hard to believe that too many people are questioning whether he's coming back at all.
Last edited by classicgmer; 08-05-2016 at 03:33 PM.
Because we have been the primary readers since forever. Therefore, we get blamed when books fail, whether we buy them
or not. The publishers simply made books they thought the customer base would buy, until the market collapsed in the 90's.
It's never fully recovered, the customer base kept getting smaller, and now they are wooing readership that they used to
ignore mostly. Smart business move if they can succeed without alienating the existing fan base, but that's not how it's
been handled, so we have divided fanbases.
I didn't gloss over anything...The guy I responded to seemed to think there was a question as to whether he'd be brought back at all. (least that's the way I'm reading it) He'll come back when Marvel feels it's appropriate whether that be 2,5 or 10 years.
Like I said he's got more cache then guys like Synch and Bill Foster so I really don't think it'll be that long but if by some miracle he's sidelined for that long it really won't bother me. (never has, never will)
I'm guessing most people most likely had the same views that Night Thrasher would never come back but he's back now & to me what they do with him going forward is far more important then the length of time he was dead.
Last edited by classicgmer; 08-05-2016 at 06:53 PM.
The problem with this statement though is that it implies that Marvel superhero comics were traditionally a "white thing" and that minorities or minority characters weren't significant part of the comics community. It also implies that having more minority/female led titles will somehow alienate white guys, but look around...lots of men like characters like Ms Marvel and Batgirl, lots of white dudes like Luke Cage and Black Panther. And by your own admission, the audience for print comics have been steadily shrinking for years, why shouldn't Marvel try to attract a wider base of readers?
Last edited by ed2962; 08-05-2016 at 06:19 PM.
Why not? the money is the same, and it's more steady. If the hypothetical person buying 25 titles stops entirely for whatever reason (just moves on, money, dies, whatever) that's 25 fewer books being sold, and all of the money from those 25 issues is lost. Someone getting one book does the same, Marvel is still making a profit from the remaining 24. Just because someone only gets one book doesn't mean they're going to be fickle about it. (in fact, I think they would be much more invested in the story being told if it wasn't just one among many that they plow through one after another)
so yeah, losing a big reader hurts more in the short term, but attracting a wider base of people who buy fewer total titles each is more steady in the long run.
Last edited by Raye; 08-05-2016 at 10:26 PM.
You missed a lot or else you wouldn't have brought up Hank Pym has zero cache and the fact that nothing can stick with him other then including him in a umpteenth Ultron story drives that point home or mentioning that time he slapped Wasp.
Hank Pym, can die for a month and brought back and still ain't worth anything