No, the point does not stand, not even a little bit, because there has been a relatively large amount of male visitors to this secluded 'man-hating' island over the course of several different books and all of them have made it off it again unmolested by Amazon hands, even a few who definitely would have deserved every last bit of it.
Yes we do... we get a picture of something we had to assume was nearly the same before.As opposed to this particular run in which we see incontrovertible proof of the Amazon's compassion and benevolence toward people. Even icky males.
I know which one I prefer.
1) Have we? They didn't seem to have any problems standing besides those men who they should perhaps fear the most: their sons and brothers.
2) Written by Robert Venditti in an entirely different book... one which just happened to feature Amazons that looked more like Rucka/Scott's than Chiangs
3) Or perhaps he was just not interested in showing it due to it not having much of anything to do with the story he wanted to tell? Why should he derail what he wanted to do to add stuff that should be in the appendix of any other book?