Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 234567 LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 92
  1. #76
    X-Cultist nx01a's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    47°9′S 126°43′W
    Posts
    14,621

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hulkout42 View Post
    No it didn't, Madelyne is a clone of Jean made by Sinister to get the combo he wanted of Summers/Grey DNA AKA Nathan and who later got demonic powers. The Phoenix never entered that equation at all.
    A fragment of the Phoenix animated Maddie's otherwise brain-dead body after Dark Phoenix 'killed' itself on the moon. It stayed in her until the Inferno issue containing the panel above... which I love.
    Quote Originally Posted by The General, JLA #38
    'Why?' Just to see the disappointment on your corn-fed, gee-whiz face, Superman. And because a great dark voice on the edge of nothing spoke to me and said you all had to die. There is no 'Why?'

  2. #77
    Ultimate Member Gray Lensman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    15,293

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ambaryerno View Post
    The canon is that 100% of Laura's genetic material comes from Logan. Kyle himself has stated this is the case, and at no point have the books said otherwise.
    Which is odd when you consider she looks alot like her 'mother' including having her eye color and not Logan's. Especially since the green eyed gene is dominant over blue - which means that Laura probably did not receive her eye color from Logan as a matter of basic science. Green eyed kids coming from blue eyed parents is possible, but it involves getting the right genetic mutations to pair up - which would require outside DNA (mother and father both have blue eyes but each carries a recessive trait that creates the green pigmentation when combined - this also could result in 2 blue eyed parents having a brown eyed kid).

    But basically, without some outside DNA (as in, not from Logan), Laura's eyes would have to be blue.
    Dark does not mean deep.

  3. #78
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    14,206

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gray Lensman View Post
    Which is odd when you consider she looks alot like her 'mother' including having her eye color and not Logan's. Especially since the green eyed gene is dominant over blue - which means that Laura probably did not receive her eye color from Logan as a matter of basic science. Green eyed kids coming from blue eyed parents is possible, but it involves getting the right genetic mutations to pair up - which would require outside DNA (mother and father both have blue eyes but each carries a recessive trait that creates the green pigmentation when combined - this also could result in 2 blue eyed parents having a brown eyed kid).

    But basically, without some outside DNA (as in, not from Logan), Laura's eyes would have to be blue.
    Oh I agree her resemblance to Sarah doesn't make genetic sense. That's probably part of why the fanon that Sarah used her own genetic material in the process of creating her is so popular, and I wouldn't mind at all if it became canon; that Laura looks like Sarah because she truly IS her daughter.

    However one thing to consider is that doubling Logan's X chromosome this way could have some bizarre implications for gene expression (if you really want to get technical, it would significantly increase her risks for congenital defects if bad genes are duplicated in that manner).

  4. #79
    Fantastic Member ChibaMariners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    347

    Default

    There's no way she could not have material from Sarah Kinney. Anyone play MGS? All the clones failed until they used Eva as a surrogate womb. And even then the clones that were successful(Sold, Liquid) even though they looked like babies still were essentially a 35+ year old man with bad habits like smoking. The only difference there is Logan has a healing factor to keep him looking young.
    Last edited by ChibaMariners; 08-14-2016 at 09:15 AM.

  5. #80
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    14,206

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ChibaMariners View Post
    There's no way she could not have material from Sarah Kinney. Anyone play MGS? All the clones failed until they used Eva as a surrogate womb. And even then the clones that were successful(Sold, Liquid) even though they looked like babies still were essentially a 35+ year old man with bad habits like smoking. The only difference there is Logan has a healing factor to keep him looking young.
    Who cares what MGS does? MGS = / = Marvel Universe. They're two completely different franchises playing by two completely different sets of rules. It's like that stupid "Star Wars ships can't fight Star Trek ships, because Star Wars uses lasers and Star Trek says lasers can't penetrate their shields," argument.

    I'm also not sure how Logan having a healing factor to keep him looking young is relevant, either. First, he's not a clone. Second, new research into real-world cloning has disproven the "A clone is of the same genetic age as the the subject being cloned" nonsense. Dolly the Sheep may have died unusually young, but other clones have exhibited completely normal aging and lifespans, with no indication that they're aging at an accelerated rate because their DNA "started older."

  6. #81
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    6,045

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ambaryerno View Post
    The canon is that 100% of Laura's genetic material comes from Logan. Kyle himself has stated this is the case, and at no point have the books said otherwise.
    Using the only available genetic sample from Weapon X, which was damaged, they were unable to salvage the Y chromosome after twenty-two attempts. Kinney proposed they create a female clone, and though her request was initially denied, she still went ahead and produced a viable female subject, prompting Sutter to reconsider. Despite resistance from his protégé Doctor Zander Rice, whom Sutter had raised after Rice's father had been killed by a bestial Wolverine at the original Weapon X Project, Sutter allowed Kinney to proceed. As revenge for her insubordination, Rice forced Kinney to act as the surrogate mother for the clone, and she gave birth to "X-23".

  7. #82

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ambaryerno View Post
    However one thing to consider is that doubling Logan's X chromosome this way could have some bizarre implications for gene expression (if you really want to get technical, it would significantly increase her risks for congenital defects if bad genes are duplicated in that manner).
    Which in turn could have some unhappy implications for Laura's "sisters" down the line, given that they're pretty much clones of a clone.

  8. #83
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    14,206

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZNOP View Post
    Using the only available genetic sample from Weapon X, which was damaged, they were unable to salvage the Y chromosome after twenty-two attempts. Kinney proposed they create a female clone, and though her request was initially denied, she still went ahead and produced a viable female subject, prompting Sutter to reconsider. Despite resistance from his protégé Doctor Zander Rice, whom Sutter had raised after Rice's father had been killed by a bestial Wolverine at the original Weapon X Project, Sutter allowed Kinney to proceed. As revenge for her insubordination, Rice forced Kinney to act as the surrogate mother for the clone, and she gave birth to "X-23".
    None of which disputes what I said.

  9. #84
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    6,045

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ambaryerno View Post
    None of which disputes what I said.
    And, all I'm saying is Laura isn't an identical clone of Logan...

  10. #85
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    14,206

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anduinel View Post
    Which in turn could have some unhappy implications for Laura's "sisters" down the line, given that they're pretty much clones of a clone.
    I'm suddenly thinking of that Michael Keaton movie where one of the clones has another clone made, and it ends up....special.

  11. #86
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    3,901

    Default

    Is that Mystique or Raze?

  12. #87
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    6,045

    Default

    Has Raze been sterilized and killed yet?

  13. #88
    Ultimate Member Gray Lensman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    15,293

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ZNOP View Post
    Has Raze been sterilized and killed yet?
    He may have been retconned out of existence (or at least having time-traveled back to the present) as a side-effect of the 'climax' (and use that word loosely) of the 'Last Will and Testament' arc of Uncanny - I'm pretty sure Charlie Jr. was, since his parents were never together.
    Dark does not mean deep.

  14. #89
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    7,521

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gray Lensman View Post
    He may have been retconned out of existence (or at least having time-traveled back to the present) as a side-effect of the 'climax' (and use that word loosely) of the 'Last Will and Testament' arc of Uncanny - I'm pretty sure Charlie Jr. was, since his parents were never together.
    Mystique still may have already given birth to Raze and Charlie, Jr. In fact we don't know if Charles's marrying Mystique was retconned out of existence, only that Matthew, his hidden mutant, was the one retconned out of existence. Later writers may still use Raze or Charles.

  15. #90
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    14,206

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WallStreeter View Post
    Mystique still may have already given birth to Raze and Charlie, Jr. In fact we don't know if Charles's marrying Mystique was retconned out of existence, only that Matthew, his hidden mutant, was the one retconned out of existence. Later writers may still use Raze or Charles.
    The timeline reset retconned out Xavier and Mystique's marriage, so IF Chuck Jr. was a product of that marriage and not just Xavier diddling around for giggles, eliminating one would eliminate the other.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •