Originally Posted by
Dwch
Well this kind of logic could never possibly be applied to a DC movie.
You only serve to emphasize my point that even movies that make a s***-ton of money can be considered flops by the studio from an investment standpoint. Going by the logic of the DC defenders, ASM2 with a production budget of $255 million, made $708 million... so they almost tripled their money! Success!
Take a movie like BvS which earned less than the two previous Batman movies despite the addition of Superman (I know, different universe, but irrelevant!), earned less than its main competition (Civil War), earned less than the $1 billion benchmark that was presumably promised to investors (a safe assumption if ASM investors were promised as much) yet according to some people, the notion that it may have under-performed is completely absurd. Give me a break.