Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 70
  1. #1
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    26,245

    Default Trank's "Fantastic Four" Originally Featured A Different Classic Villain

    The original screenplay for last year's "Fantastic Four" flop featured an additional big name baddie besides Doom.


    Full article here.

  2. #2
    Non-fanboy Member Cel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Level 42
    Posts
    454

    Default

    I'd trade any future Fantastic Four movie for the return of the Fantastic Four book.
    "Ignore them. They're nothing but a bunch of basement dwellers who spend all day whining on the 'net. Not a single open-minded one in the bunch."
    --Andre Briggs, Justice League International #1

  3. #3
    Unapologetic NYer GDC3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    670

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cel View Post
    I'd trade any future Fantastic Four movie for the return of the Fantastic Four book.
    Yes. Seconded.
    Bronze Age baby.
    OGG - Original Grim 'n Gritty

    Punchedugly.com

  4. #4
    BANNED
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    7,168

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cel View Post
    I'd trade any future Fantastic Four movie for the return of the Fantastic Four book.
    Nobody's stopping Marvel.

  5. #5
    Fantastic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    433

    Default

    Here's how bad Trank's Fantastic 4 was. It bombed. IN this era of movies, it bombed

  6. #6
    Mighty Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    1,566

    Default

    Oh, just let it go... Let Kevin Feige and compony work their magic on the franchise. Because at this point you futzed it up to such a degree that none wants to go near that IP with a stick... Thanks a bunch, FOX!

    EDIT: I mean the only reason why FOX is not running around in panic over their superhero properties is thanks to Deadpool and its incredible financial success and immense popularity. Shame the X-Men are stuck in their creative limbo, too.
    Last edited by solletaire; 08-16-2016 at 12:05 PM.

  7. #7
    Fantastic Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    271

    Default

    Fantastic Four should be about grand-scale adventure with a side dish of family comedy-drama. So simple, but apparently so impossible for Fox to make it right. No, it's not a pure comedy sitcom with superheroes. No, it's not a body horror tragedy. It might have a bit of comedy and a bit of tragedy, but the large-scale adventuring should take center stage.

  8. #8
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    6,457

    Default

    Using Doom as the main villain of the franchise's first film is a mistake. It was a mistake when Tim Story did it and it was a mistake when Trank did it. The conflict between Doom and Reed is so intensely personal that it shrinks the scope of the film. The lead off villain should be a big, world-threatening danger that gives the FF a chance to establish themselves, publicly, as protectors of the world.

  9. #9
    Spectacular Member MoonDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    225

    Default

    I thought FF couldn't have been worse. I stand corrected.

  10. #10
    Fantastic Member ospfwildcard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    halting katastrophe
    Posts
    437

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rene Narciso View Post
    Fantastic Four should be about grand-scale adventure with a side dish of family comedy-drama. So simple, but apparently so impossible for Fox to make it right. No, it's not a pure comedy sitcom with superheroes. No, it's not a body horror tragedy. It might have a bit of comedy and a bit of tragedy, but the large-scale adventuring should take center stage.
    Regardless of the pittfalls of the firat f4 film it did a great job in the family clashes. It was colorful and a fun film.
    Marvel and DC comics are no different than the food at McDonalds. It will fill you up but in the end bad for your health. Read more independent publishers. Get away from the corporate homogenous cookie cutter fast food comics.

  11. #11
    Fantastic Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    271

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ospfwildcard View Post
    Regardless of the pittfalls of the firat f4 film it did a great job in the family clashes. It was colorful and a fun film.
    Yes, it was colorful and fun. The problem was that the movie was too "small", so the comedy element sort of overwhelmed it. It was what I would expect from an Ant-Man movie, and even the actual Ant-Man movie had more action and intensity than FF.

  12. #12
    Social Injustice Warrior lolgaxe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Freelance Shame Squad Headquarters
    Posts
    120

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kalorama View Post
    Using Doom as the main villain of the franchise's first film is a mistake.
    Having a director that wanted to film a completely different movie was the first mistake.

  13. #13
    Extraordinary Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    6,669

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by simbob4000 View Post
    Nobody's stopping Marvel.
    Yes there is. His name is Isaac Perlmutter.

  14. #14
    Extraordinary Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    6,669

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ospfwildcard View Post
    Regardless of the pittfalls of the firat f4 film it did a great job in the family clashes. It was colorful and a fun film.

    .....................did we see the same film?

  15. #15
    Fantastic Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    271

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kalorama View Post
    Using Doom as the main villain of the franchise's first film is a mistake. It was a mistake when Tim Story did it and it was a mistake when Trank did it. The conflict between Doom and Reed is so intensely personal that it shrinks the scope of the film. The lead off villain should be a big, world-threatening danger that gives the FF a chance to establish themselves, publicly, as protectors of the world.
    I agree.

    And I think it's a mistake to devote a lot of time to the FF origin. Their origin is more of a "let's get it out of the way" origin that does not even take the whole of their first issue. In a movie, it should be a flashback. The FF movie should have a world with aliens, lost kingdoms, magic, monsters, imaginary countries, right out of the gate. The closest I've seen in a live action was the Guardians of the Galaxy movie.

    I'd even take a page of the X-Men movies and set it in the actual 1960s.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •