Originally Posted by
Kurolegacy
It undermines these characters and becomes less believable because, unlike her, all of these other characters actually earned their places amongst their peers. They weren't around for the comic book equivalent of 5 seconds and declared to be the best of the best. Hell when characters like Amadeus Cho were created, while he was said to be one of the smartest, he certainly was placed as the smartest, he was placed at #7 and even that's been joked at since then. Things like Hulk is the strongest there is and Wolverine is the best there is at what he does are more so hyperbole than actual fact whereas here they're literally trying to prove she is in fact the smartest.
Don't know why her being essentially a prodigy isn't enough and she has to be seen as the best of the best but as I've said earlier in the thread, things like this cause titles like smartest person to lose all meaning considering that they can just throw out some random nobody and just declare them to be the best without really any of the trials that any others had to go through to prove why they're considered for their places.