Originally Posted by
K. Jones
I've commented up and down about the overload of sequence-breaking in this comic. It requires a minor adjustment for me to enjoy - which is to say, I read it and am like "gah, sequence-breaks, come on, Snyder, give me some linear plot, the back-up is flashback enough!" But when I muse about the issue after the fact, in my memory all the events play out in the proper chronological order, just with the pieces that are still missing, missing.
Anyway, what I really want to talk about today is just Romita on Batman. Ever since I read Super Powers I've wondered just what the hell it would be like to have a Jack Kirby Batman book. Last year was the year I finally caught up on all my Kirby, and it became so clear to me that the early 1970s can just be regarded as the time period when O'Neil & Adams redefined Gotham and Kirby redefined Metropolis (with some O'Neil crossover, naturally, depending on the title.) I'm incredibly beholden to a kind of post-Adams, and especially Mazzucchelli, and influences-influencing-influences, Bruce Timm influenced Gotham. Those are my leanings - there's a lot of wiggle-room, but I think the New Gotham era of Rucka & Brubaker did it best, running a spectrum from Timm-style to Mazz-style in like, Gotham Central. Jump ahead a few years, Morrison's run is definitely more in the O'Neil or even Aparo mould - Kubert felt like, well, a Kubert, but the subject matter was Talia, Tony Daniel came with somewhat Aparo-like art (albeit with a Jim Lee filter on it), and then things just got weird with your Quitelys and Burnhams, but still with loads of classic Bat-artist iconography attached - some even revived from near-death and embarrassment.
So, anyway, back on track here ... never have I ever really seen a bombastic, high-impact, Kirby-style Batman story. And what's surprising to me is how natural it feels - not just because Kirby was operating on the Peak Kirby Level at the same time Batman was undergoing his Gothic Revival, but also because of how seamlessly it mixes with you know, the kind of Batman '66 vibe. Snyder must be feeling the same way, because for god's sake we got Bat Shark Repellent in this issue. And the high-velocity onomatopoeic visceral CRUNCH of things like Waylon Jones slamming a felled log into Batman's chest not only looks like a Kirby impact, but feels like a Batman '66 "POW!" moment. Plus Batman's being on the run, escaping, ducking, and gadgeting his way out of an onslaught of enemies ... well frankly it feels a hell of a lot like Mister Miracle!
I'm also really thinking about irony and Bat-cliche storytelling devices. A "Villain Gauntlet" is not new to Batman. They started small in the Sixties with things like Batman: The Movie's four unified knaves, and by the 80s were on overkill mode, with the first true Gauntlet I can remember being "All My Enemies Against Me" - a short but sweet unified villainy when Killer Croc made his debut, but then went really overkill with Batman # 400, "Resurrection Night", where Ra's al Ghul unleashes like, every Bat-rogue ever made from prison. Obviously then the mothers of all gauntlets happen - Arkham Asylum: A Serious House, the gauntlet Bane unleashes on him, and so on down the line. The Arkham games are virtually made whole-clothe from this concept. And lastly, that I can recall, besides a couple "mini-gauntlets" of villains in Layman's underrated Detective run, what I'm really thinking about is David Finch's pretty awful "excuse me I just want to draw every Bat-character ever" New 52 Batman: The Dark Knight run.
Now Snyder is doing one. Pretty good one so far, too.