Originally Posted by
Ambaryerno
Much of this could have been averted had Editorial in the earlier days allowed writers like Claremont to let their characters grow old and move on like they originally WANTED to, rather than hamfistedly enforcing the status quo. Immortal and other long-lived characters such as Wolverine and Thor could have then been used as a poignant examination of how the world changes around them. We also wouldn't be in the situation where we get a new generation of characters only for them to go right back into limbo so the old guard can continue hogging the spotlight. Imagine had the New X-Men been allowed to become THE X-Men mentoring the Bendis-Men, while Gen X, the New Mutants, and the others (except characters like Wolverine, whose longevity is part of their power sets) slowly passing into the twilight.
There's SO MUCH that could be done with that. There'd almost certainly be a less vicious reaction to Legacy Characters had the concept of characters retiring/dying and being succeeded by a younger generation been built in to the world from the start.
In fact, I'd LOVE to see Marvel create a line of comics built on that very concept: Characters age in real time. Dead means dead (except for EXTREME circumstances). People age, grow up, and move on in their lives. They retire and pass their mantles on to the next generation. Have the ages of all the characters be based on when they were introduced. So the O5 would be in their 60s New Mutants in their 40s, Gen X in their 30s, New X-Men in their 20s, etc. Extend it to the rest of the MU; Stark is back to being a Vietnam-era industrialist, Franklin and Val Richards CAN ACTUALLY GROW UP, etc. Make it a line separate from the main Marvel universe, and just let time run.