Having thought a lot about why paper matters in a digital age, there's a great deal I could say about why newspapers matter.
And given the conversation down there in the dis-United States, it seems to me if news exists only on digital platforms you get echo chambers and fake news. For sure that can happen with print journalism, too--but there's the chance for paper to get physically shared and bypass the digital filters. Yada yada yada.
I don't understand why people want to get rid of Clark Kent. Don't some believe that Clark is the real person and Superman the mask? So by that logic, all you'd have is a mask. Or you'd have stories where all Superman does is hang around the farm all day in his long underwear cracking wise to his son until an emergency relieves the boredom and he can go off and fly into action.
I want to think that Clark, from an early age, is really interested in 1) the English language and its artful use; 2) social activism; and 3) the fifth estate. There's a lot of good stories that could be written around that. Like, how did Clark first discover his passion for journalism--was there an influential newpaper person who crossed his path when he was a boy? Did he have a school teacher that encouraged him? What books were in his personal library?