I'm not a fan of the idea either. Ya'll know I'm tentatively fine with Clark taking Zod's life. But Lex? No.
But I gotta admit, I was more curious about what Lex did and that story than I was just about every other mystery the New52 threw at me. Lex! What did you DO!?
Sorry man, I gotta disagree (mostly).
First off, on the execution side of things, I think Superman #75 is well crafted. The dialogue is perhaps a little too exposition-y but the issue doesn't lose its sense of urgency. There are some nice character interactions, powerful iconography, and the mystery of who and what Doomsday was played nicely into the tension. And of course, the hype was huge. It's what pulled me into the comics, actually. I dont do nostalgia....except for Superman 75. Much love. But the fight itself isn't as....wide....and imaginative as it should have been. It just isn't, and we've seen better from the same creators. At the very least it should have crossed beyond the city. It's not too hard to imagine these two throwing each other around and crossing miles in seconds. I get that part of the threat and the problem is that Clark couldnt actually move Doomsday around too much. But he did manage it a few times, and the results should have been more dramatic.
"We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another, as if we were one single tribe."
~ Black Panther.
I always thought that they handled the Doomsday fight in the SUPERMAN/ DOOMSDAY animated movie Better than the comics version, particularly the end.
As for what Lex might have done to piss Clark off enough to drive him to kill , I remember a Bleeding Cool rumor that Lex would have been responsible somehow for Lana dying. This was before Pak got hold of her and reimagined her. I remember wondering at the time that both Pete and Lana,who figured into Morrison's ACTION run , were suspiciously absent in present set stories.
Anyhow, things worked out for the best ( mostly).
When it comes to comics,one person's "fan-service" is another persons personal cannon. So by definition it's ALL fan service. Aren't we ALL fans?
SUPERMAN is the greatest fictional character ever created.
Me too. It's not close, either, the movie's fight is a lot cooler than the one in the books.
Heh- I have a theory that Lana was the Anti-Superman Army's K-Woman Red. K-Woman Red had a few lines like "If I can't have you, nobody can!" in the kind of crowd-dialogue scenes Morrison likes so much, surrounded by other villains. Anyway, there were enough of those that I buy into it. Not that I bought into it at the time, I don't even think I noticed it until after reading Action # 25, but I do think that K-Woman Red was intended to be Lana and Morrison just left it open ended because he'd rather imply her involvement than make it a big deal that she became a villain.As for what Lex might have done to piss Clark off enough to drive him to kill , I remember a Bleeding Cool rumor that Lex would have been responsible somehow for Lana dying. This was before Pak got hold of her and reimagined her. I remember wondering at the time that both Pete and Lana,who figured into Morrison's ACTION run , were suspiciously absent in present set stories.
Anyhow, things worked out for the best ( mostly).
"You know the deal, Metropolis. Treat people right or expect a visit from me."
Just how long is continuous? Because I'm arguing that in a lot of cases it wouldn't/shouldn't be that a dictatorship conveniently has a humanitarian government just waiting to fill the vacuum. If the story is supposed to be plausible it can't be over in even 12 issues- Superman has just gone from being about saving the world to being about the day-to-day building of it.
Superman needs to be the army/police until he can find trustworthy, experienced people to fill those roles since odds are the guys who were soldiers or police before aren't guys you want doing the job. And while he's doing that the other dictators keep doing what they were doing- unless you think Superman is going to take them all out and then try to police multiple locations/populations simultaneously.
There's where Clark Kent gets into play. Every dictatorship has its opposition. It is regularly comprised of radicals, nutjobs and humanitarians. Clark would identify whom is whom. That's the adventure: Superman getting to know the players and maneuvering amongst them. It can take Superman 12 issues to topple the dictator while making sure the right person gets in charge and then 12 issues more making sure said person stays in charge and doesn't become a tyrant as well. That's the fun. He is faster than an speeding bullet he can be anywhere at anytime. And yes he can fail and it would be good if he fails. The important part is to actually have Superman involved and actually trying to better the world. Do you actually believe that in Syria there's just the government, Russians, Rebels and the US fighting over the country? No. There are lots of humanitarians getting the hell bombed out of them. If Superman was real he would be flying all over Aleppo deflecting bombs, destroying missiles with heat vision and pulling people out of the rubble and the dangerous areas. Hell, he might even be paying Putin a visit. If we're to believe Superman is a moral being he would take action in a situation like that.
I always hear people saying Superman shouldn't get involved in real life like events but actually I think that's the better way to make him relevant again and to have people talking and reading his adventures again.
"By force of will he turns his gaze upon the seething horror bellow us on the hillside.
Yes, he feels the icy touch of fear, but he is not cowed. He is Superman!"
It seems you guys think of that 7' height as being excessive. Yeah, he'd be pretty tall, but in the end nothing abnormal for humans, I suppose. As for the clothes, those would help hide his body type, not his height. The posture is the factor that would help him hide the latter.
Post of the day right here. Well, at least of the day it was posted.
Michael Rosenbaum's Lex was *EXCELLENT*.
Last edited by 666MasterOfPuppets; 01-13-2017 at 07:14 AM.
The rest of the film after is pure bollocks,however that first part? in my head that WAS the Doomsday fight.
I never really noticed that! Makes sense!Heh- I have a theory that Lana was the Anti-Superman Army's K-Woman Red. K-Woman Red had a few lines like "If I can't have you, nobody can!" in the kind of crowd-dialogue scenes Morrison likes so much, surrounded by other villains. Anyway, there were enough of those that I buy into it. Not that I bought into it at the time, I don't even think I noticed it until after reading Action # 25, but I do think that K-Woman Red was intended to be Lana and Morrison just left it open ended because he'd rather imply her involvement than make it a big deal that she became a villain.
When it comes to comics,one person's "fan-service" is another persons personal cannon. So by definition it's ALL fan service. Aren't we ALL fans?
SUPERMAN is the greatest fictional character ever created.
I've never heard of the guy, however if he's anything like Michael ROSENBAUM, he is awesome!
I'm in the process of a Smallville rewatch now. Up to Season 3. Man he was just brilliant. He and John Glover as Lionel was just a master class in acting of two actors just playing off each other.
When it comes to comics,one person's "fan-service" is another persons personal cannon. So by definition it's ALL fan service. Aren't we ALL fans?
SUPERMAN is the greatest fictional character ever created.
Ha! You're right! Editing post right now.
And yes, I agree. For some reason, I liked more evil Lionel than "reformed by Clark's spirit" Lionel (or was it by Clark's body? Or both? Can't remember), although the latter was good, too.
What I'm saying is that even if they fought on Mars a bit and broke the time barrier with their punches or whatever, the spectacle of Superman's full power likely wouldn't have lived up to its hype. I think what we assume he has is almost always going to be more than what we're given.
Just the one thing I would have wanted for the legacy of Superman since they did decide to go that route, is something like what the BvS movie had. A simple throwaway line about how fighting Doomsday actually made it tougher. So then what Superman would have done is overloaded it and therefore future battles wouldn't be like, "he's as strong as Doomsday!" since Doomsday in that case would be above the idea of sheer strength.
I think there are obvious strengths to animated films that the best comics can't match, namely sound and motion. Since this thread is controversial opinions, I'll go ahead and admit that I have little interest in the Maggin books because text alone seems worthless with this character.
But aside from that, the Suplex of Doom really didn't impress me as I saw this some time after the Busiek comic where Superman survived being knocked straight through the Earth. Also, since Superman would be well aware that going into low orbit would give him the option to basically land anywhere, I find it strange that he crashed back in Metropolis.
"By force of will he turns his gaze upon the seething horror bellow us on the hillside.
Yes, he feels the icy touch of fear, but he is not cowed. He is Superman!"