View Poll Results: Is Homecoming drawing heavily from the Miles Morales Spider-Man comics.

Voters
130. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    68 52.31%
  • No/ Not really.

    62 47.69%
Page 7 of 21 FirstFirst ... 3456789101117 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 105 of 302
  1. #91
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    2,140

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Iron Fist View Post
    They are playing down Parker's ability quite a bit, only thing he's done to show his intellect is dumpster dive and make web shooters. His suit being customised again by Stark in the movie once again takes away from Parker's intellect. There's no reason he couldn't have done that upgrade himself.

    Which again, if they're playing down his intellect he's a lot more like Miles who is rather average or on the upper end of intelligence, not a genius like Parker is MEANT to be.
    Peter's situation doesn't really let him afford all the tech or equipment needed. He's got a good grasp on the theory and likely had input on the suit Tony made, but it took Tony's resources to actually get it made. With the limited budget he has when Tony approaches is it really surprising his costume is a glorified onesie?

  2. #92
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    18,566

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Iron Fist View Post
    They are playing down Parker's ability quite a bit, only thing he's done to show his intellect is dumpster dive and make web shooters. His suit being customised again by Stark in the movie once again takes away from Parker's intellect. There's no reason he couldn't have done that upgrade himself.
    He's the first movie Spider-Man who created web fluid and the delivery sistem for it all on his own.

    As for costumes... Even comicbook Spidey just got his suit from his wrestling agent when he was just starting out.

  3. #93
    Extraordinary Member t hedge coke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Weihai
    Posts
    7,375

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carabas View Post
    As for costumes... Even comicbook Spidey just got his suit from his wrestling agent when he was just starting out.
    Ultimate Peter even died without ever learning to sew decently.
    Patsy Walker on TV! Patsy Walker in new comics! Patsy Walker in your brain! And Jessica Jones is the new Nancy! (Oh, and read the Comics Cube.)

  4. #94
    Shou-Lao The Bitch Dragon Iron Fist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    7,064

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alan2099 View Post

    EVERYTHING Miles has is Peter's to use. Miles is the derivative character of Peter's. The same way anything Spider-girl, Spider-man 2099, or Venom';s is Peters to use. His race has nothing to do with it and it doesn't matter how offended you want to be.
    So you agree, they're ripping off Miles.

  5. #95
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    18,566

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Iron Fist View Post
    So you agree, they're ripping off Miles.
    That is not what "ripping off" means.

    You can't rip off what you already own (okay, have full rights to use).

  6. #96
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    2,140

    Default

    Ned being closer to Ganke than his comicbook counter-part is based on Mile Morales, but most of the footage so far indicates there's plenty taken from Peter material.

  7. #97
    Shou-Lao The Bitch Dragon Iron Fist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    7,064

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carabas View Post
    That is not what "ripping off" means.

    You can't rip off what you already own (okay, have full rights to use).
    Rip off

    noun

    an inferior imitation of something.
    How is Peter's life not an imitation of Miles's life when Peter never had a Ganke type sidekick friend before and has never gone to charter school in his decades of continuity?

    Alan2099 was basically saying it's a rip off, but he considers nothing wrong with it because Miles is seen as a derivative, which is a whole other topic.

  8. #98
    Spectacular Member LASERlips's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    198

    Default

    I think it's obvious they lifted Ganke from Miles' supporting cast and gave him to Peter instead. I'm not too happy about it in the sense that it takes away what tiny little chance there may have been to ever have a Miles movie. But it looks like it will be good fun, so I'm not going to boycott or anything.

    This kind of thing has happened before, btw. Adaptations don't always adapt exactly. Not a good movie, but Nic Cage played Johnny Blaze in Ghost Rider, yet had the looks and powers of Dan Ketch. It happens.

  9. #99
    Better than YOU! Alan2099's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    7,516

    Default

    How is Peter's life not an imitation of Miles's life when Peter never had a Ganke type sidekick friend before and has never gone to charter school in his decades of continuity?
    How is Miles not an imitation of Peter, when he calls himself Spider-man, wears a Spider-man like costume, and has Spider-man powers?

    If you want to say this movie is ripping off Miles, then you first have to concede that Miles very existence is a rip-off of Peter's.

    But that's okay, because it's Peter's franchise. If Peter's friends in the movie where Courtney, JJ, Nancy, and Moose, he got a job working for a corporation called Alchemex, while being instigated by a Detective Makoto for outting the Sin-Eater as the wrong guy he still wouldn't be ripping off anybody but himself. This is all Peter's franchise and it's all his to use. Whether its' a good idea or not is the only thing debatable.

    If you're upset that Spider-man took things from Miles, you should be equally upset that Miles exists.

  10. #100
    Shou-Lao The Bitch Dragon Iron Fist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    7,064

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alan2099 View Post
    How is Miles not an imitation of Peter, when he calls himself Spider-man, wears a Spider-man like costume, and has Spider-man powers?

    If you want to say this movie is ripping off Miles, then you first have to concede that Miles very existence is a rip-off of Peter's.

    But that's okay, because it's Peter's franchise. If Peter's friends in the movie where Courtney, JJ, Nancy, and Moose, he got a job working for a corporation called Alchemex, while being instigated by a Detective Makoto for outting the Sin-Eater as the wrong guy he still wouldn't be ripping off anybody but himself. This is all Peter's franchise and it's all his to use. Whether its' a good idea or not is the only thing debatable.

    If you're upset that Spider-man took things from Miles, you should be equally upset that Miles exists.
    If you think Miles has spider-mans powers, i'd encourage you to read a miles book.

    Why would I be upset Miles exists? Peter was dead and Miles came along. And he has different power-set, costume, origin, background, supporting characters. It's like saying Spider-woman is a Peter Parker derivative despite also been made into her own entity just like miles.

    The only derivative character from Peter is Gwen and that's because she replaced Parker in his own narrative as an elseworlds story, which was kind of the point.

  11. #101
    Ultimate Member Mister Mets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    19,106

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alan2099 View Post
    How is Miles not an imitation of Peter, when he calls himself Spider-man, wears a Spider-man like costume, and has Spider-man powers?

    If you want to say this movie is ripping off Miles, then you first have to concede that Miles very existence is a rip-off of Peter's.

    But that's okay, because it's Peter's franchise. If Peter's friends in the movie where Courtney, JJ, Nancy, and Moose, he got a job working for a corporation called Alchemex, while being instigated by a Detective Makoto for outting the Sin-Eater as the wrong guy he still wouldn't be ripping off anybody but himself. This is all Peter's franchise and it's all his to use. Whether its' a good idea or not is the only thing debatable.

    If you're upset that Spider-man took things from Miles, you should be equally upset that Miles exists.
    There is the identity politics argument that due to problems with representation in the past, it is okay to racebend in one direction but not another. So it would be okay to have a black actor play a white character, or to have a black character who uses elements of a white character, but not the other way around. As a result it would be fine to have a Miles Morales who has a lot of the same elements as an existing white character (Peter Parker, the teenager with spider-based powers) but the argument would be that it's not okay in an adaptation for a white character to have any elements that were introduced with a minority character.
    Sincerely,
    Thomas Mets

  12. #102
    BANNED MyLittleXero's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    47

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Iron Fist View Post
    If you think Miles has spider-mans powers, i'd encourage you to read a miles book.

    Why would I be upset Miles exists? Peter was dead and Miles came along. And he has different power-set, costume, origin, background, supporting characters. It's like saying Spider-woman is a Peter Parker derivative despite also been made into her own entity just like miles.

    The only derivative character from Peter is Gwen and that's because she replaced Parker in his own narrative as an elseworlds story, which was kind of the point.
    Spider Woman was always her own entity she has nearly nothing to do with Peter.
    And I've read Mile's book he has all the same powers except a barely used camouflage and a bullshit vemon sting that somehow beats everyone.

  13. #103
    Shou-Lao The Bitch Dragon Iron Fist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    7,064

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mister Mets View Post
    There is the identity politics argument that due to problems with representation in the past, it is okay to racebend in one direction but not another. So it would be okay to have a black actor play a white character, or to have a black character who uses elements of a white character, but not the other way around. As a result it would be fine to have a Miles Morales who has a lot of the same elements as an existing white character (Peter Parker, the teenager with spider-based powers) but the argument would be that it's not okay in an adaptation for a white character to have any elements that were introduced with a minority character.
    Exactly. There is no lack of white heroes. A fact the MCU is perpetuating.

    Quote Originally Posted by MyLittleXero View Post
    Spider Woman was always her own entity she has nearly nothing to do with Peter.
    And I've read Mile's book he has all the same powers except a barely used camouflage and a bullshit vemon sting that somehow beats everyone.
    So Spider-woman who has several power the same as Miles and Peter is her own entity, but Miles who essentially has the same powers as Spider-woman ISN'T his own entity?

    That's seem tenuous.

  14. #104
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LASERlips View Post
    I think it's obvious they lifted Ganke from Miles' supporting cast and gave him to Peter instead. I'm not too happy about it in the sense that it takes away what tiny little chance there may have been to ever have a Miles movie.
    What I don't get is if they wanted to give Peter a non-white best friend, why didn't they just use characters from the comics that he actually has been good friends with like Hobie Brown or Philip Chang.

  15. #105
    Amazing Member MJM Mystery Writer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Northern New York
    Posts
    72

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thefiresky View Post
    I think that you underestimate the possibility that MM, because he hasn't had a mainstream medium, is less popular. I'd bet that if they did a MM movie, it'd be the highest selling Spiderman film to date, given America's diversity. Thus opening up the margin for competitive marketing i.e. toys, clothing etc. I think a lot of Parker fans are scarred to give MM that leeway.
    You truly over-estimate what people in America want. If there was such a HUGE demand for diversity and throwing away white male characters just to replace them with legacy characters.......then people like Donald Trump wouldn't have been elected. But the truth is....outside the huge cities on San Fran, NYC, Detroit, and cities of that size.....people like classics. They like traditions. If you want diversity.........then create a black guy who isn't named Spider-man and give him different powers. Now doesn't that seem like the easiest thing to do? Or would you rather complain that your "legacy" character isn't getting the screen time that the ORIGINAL guy has....simply because Peter is a WHITE male.

    Sure a "Miles" movie might do well in all the cities I mentioned, but in the mid-west, where Trump won nearly every state, a Miles movie wouldn't do any better than "Howard the Duck" did in the 1980s. Most people in that region don't like diversity shoved down their throats just for the sake of diversity. And let's not gloss over the fact that Marvel/DC can ONLY do this with white characters. There's NO way that they'd kill Power Man, the Prowler, or War Machine and replace them with a blonde white guy. It's just NOT going to happen. Plain and simple. SO stop bitching whenever Marvel uses their original character to tell a story....either in movies or comics!

    You might see this, roll your eyes, and scream 'racist' but I don't care. Truth is, unless these 'creators' develop some new heroes that aren't just rip-offs of former white guys, then we will always have this argument. Move on and find another topic to complain about. This crap is getting sooooooo old!!!!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •