Originally Posted by
TooFlyToFail
Still tho, it's best not to get bogged down with having to "be true" to the material. Look at Logan: an amalgamation of OML, Target X, X-23 (KYost), and Death of Wolverine, but still not feeling like it's forcing itself to be something.
Try to do both. Tho, there are some cases when they should just copy the comics.
Also, I like this direction of smaller budget movies, that allow for more creative freedom. This the direction that Gambit should go in. Just make it a heist movie, or a VS heist movie where Fantomex and Gambit are both trying to steal something valuable.
Want to bring back Michael Fassbender? Good, but keep him out of the X-Men movies for a bit. How do you do that? Give him a movie of him founding Genosha. Base it off the Utopia X arc of Ultimate Comics X-Men. That in itself can be 2-3 movies.
Having X-Men movies that cover different areas of the X-Men Universe is world building.
- Deadpool (comedy, with rotation of guest stars)
- New Mutants (with rotation of X-kid rosters, to explore the idea of the next generation of X-Men being trained)
- Genosha/Utopia X (exploring the wider world of mutants)
- Logan/Wolverine solo movies (to give the dude his own R-rated adventures, and keep him busy enough that if he does show up he's only a secondary player in the main X-Men movies)
- X-Force (this the team the Wolverine leads, but it's more of a series of "man on a mission", ensemble movies)
- Xcaliber (a UK based team that deals the multi-dimensional)
- X-Men (main movies that focus on non-Wolverine/Xavier/Magneto/Mystique characters; pure sci-fi, and grand scale epics)
So yeah, a lot of lower to mid level budget movies, that act as the foundation, with the X-Men movies being the giant specticals.