Is it weird that I prefer this Lego Batgirl over the current horrendous comic version of Batgirl?
Damn, B of Burnside should've never been written. What a tragedy.
Is it weird that I prefer this Lego Batgirl over the current horrendous comic version of Batgirl?
Damn, B of Burnside should've never been written. What a tragedy.
yep, and "cringy" is exactly the right word lol. Everything interesting about Barbara was thrown to the wind so she could be portrayed as too young, wearing a stupid Rue 21 costume, leave that garbage in the "new 52" where it belongs lol. there's no media synergy pulling her in that direction anyway I assume it's just "52 leftovers". When Barbara was first introduced in the silver age she was already a librarian, and somewhat of a detective in her own right, in like her mid twenties, she's definitely older than Dick, so she was created to be written to that type, if DC wants that type of Batgirl use Steph, who a lot of people want to see back in the role anyway.
Phantom rough on roughnecks- Old Jungle Saying
Isn't it more the case that The Lego Batman Movie depicted Batgirl at the age she's at NOW in the comics, but Bruce and Dick at the ages they were at when they first appeared (which is a good decade younger than they are nowadays). Hence why Batgirl became Batman's love interest instead of Robin's.
Obviously, that means you can't cite the movie at all when complaining about anything in the comics. It's comparing apples and oranges, seriously!
Batgirl of Burnside is a much richer take on Babs.
After seeing Lego Batman, i didn't have a problem with its depiction of Babs. It was different, closer to Congresswoman Gordon mixed in with Batman Beyond Babs, but enjoyable. It not like she showed any romantic interest in Batman.
Batgirl is the brand. Giving that up to be called Batwoman would be a mistake, imo. You are going from a higher tier to a lower one. They want to keep her as a young adult who is trying to balance a hero life, college life, and a personal life. So using Batgirl is fine.
Well, for one thing, Babs WAS a grown woman when she made her first comic book appearance. She was a college graduate librarian with a PhD. She was far more likely to be Bruce's love interest than Dick's.
Batgirl is the codename she's best remembered for. They probably keep it for tradition more than anything else, whether she's portrayed as a teen or not.
And I'm sorry, but unless you're Dick Grayson or Barbara Gordon, I doubt WB cares about carving out a niche for most Bat Family members. Which is smart. We don't need to see a billion Batfamily members onscreen anyway. Dick, Babs, and, if Dick is Nightwing, a replacement Robin is really all that is needed.
Comic wise I can't stand her outfit and i dislike the direction her comics have taken...
I prefer that one.
Jason Todd, Cassandra Cain, Helena Wayne, Bruce, Harper, Kate, Dick, Barbra, Thomas, Brenna, Tim, Damian, Duke , Stephanie, Luke, Terry,
#BATSQUAD
I loved the new costume and direction initially... but it has dated very quickly.
Time for a return to a classic costume.
And tell Batwoman, Barbara wants her hair color back!!!
DC is ruining Babs as a character and Batgirl as a mantle...all for a niche that barely exists anyway...the sales numbers don't lie...DC *ited on dozens of thousands of loyal readers in favour of a supposed younger girler and more modern generation that's into the abomination that we have now going by as Batgirl.
All we can do is hoping that DC's dumbiness don't last much longer.
Last edited by Conn Seanery; 02-23-2017 at 11:10 AM. Reason: rude
Last edited by Conn Seanery; 02-23-2017 at 11:11 AM.
DC should be smart enough to do the most logical thing on this case, Barbara becomes Oracle again, the current "tone" of the Batgirl title is dropped to a more serious and less silly one, the costume is dropped and next year they give the mantle to either Cass or Steph...everybody wins