Originally Posted by
boots
i don't feel he's changing subject or deflecting; he's just choosing not to answer. and that's his right.
i'm currently attached to a major project that is catching a lot of heat from the online audience. and it's frustrating/amusing (depending on the mood i'm in that day) watching them come up with theories about a process they're not privy too. and it's really disappointing watching these theories spread on social media to the point where they become "facts" and will possibly snowball into backlash. it's actually trippy seeing how certain some people are that "x must have happened" and they were "thinking y" when i know for a fact that it didn't and they don't.
when people ascribe malicious or cynical intent to a team or individuals that i know worked sincerely and tirelessly to create something they believe in, it can be heart breaking.
and i really, really want to just blow those incorrect and frankly damaging "facts" out of the water, but i can't, because it's not my place to speak on behalf of others or for a studio or corporation.
i totally agree, i would love dan to supply more insight. bts is always fascinating, but i'm guessing there are simply professional limits to which he can do so. or maybe he just can't be bothered...who knows? at the end of the day, what do we need with those particular insights? are we assuming that as outsiders we can disseminate and analyse them better than someone who works for marvel? that we can find some flaw in the reasoning? we either trust dan's input or we don't.