There is a difference between good fiction and bad fiction. And why is it that comic books are the only form of fiction that utilize stupid "rules" on fiction such as "no-aging" of the character?You don't see novels,movies and other forms of entertainment obeying such nonsensical "rules" such as "no-aging".
But it made sense before OMD?It didn't make sense then {with OMD} and it sure doesn't make any sense now.
James Bond.You don't see novels,movies and other forms of entertainment obeying such nonsensical "rules" such as "no-aging".
James Bond? Not necessarily...especially if progression is meant to age the character.
He does marry one of his Bond Girls in the novel “On Her Majesty’s Secret Service”, but she is killed on their wedding day and Bond is left devastated. This set the scene for him to get revenge in the following novel.
In some of the short stories, that were written by another author, but are part of the Bond world, Bond has a son. He has the baby with Kissy Suzuki but the child is hardly mentioned until another story where he makes contact with Bond shortly before being murdered.
It's not that James Bond doesn't age...we are simply not told his age or when he does age...but yet we have character progression in the stories which shows the passage of time with events happening in his life that results in the aging of his character.
James Bond? Not necessarily...especially if progression is meant to age the character.
He does marry one of his Bond Girls in the novel “On Her Majesty’s Secret Service”, but she is killed on their wedding day and Bond is left devastated. This set the scene for him to get revenge in the following novel.
In some of the short stories, that were written by another author, but are part of the Bond world, Bond has a son. He has the baby with Kissy Suzuki but the child is hardly mentioned until another story where he makes contact with Bond shortly before being murdered.
It's not that James Bond doesn't age...we are simply not told his age or when he does age...but yet we have character progression in the stories which shows the passage of time with events happening in his life that results in the aging of his character.
That's almost exactly how the Marvel Universe works. I'm not quite sure how you're having a problem not grasping this.
The only comic book character I know of where there is a set rate of aging is called Judge Dredd. Otherwise, Peter Parker's age is arbitrary to whatever the guys at Marvel say it is. He had close to two years of issues in High School, way more than that in college, and if they had known that he wouldn't fail to sell as a character years ago, which is something that they didn't know in the business climate at the time, they would have kept him in high school or at least in college. The main driver for aging him was that they didn't know how long he would last as a character who sold merchandise and comic books back when he started. They have slowed it down for him. 616 Peter Parker tells one story, the other universes tell others. Look, I know everybody has said this probably at least once, but it's easily the best option to just go support Renew Your Vows if him being older and married is your genuine on/off factor to him as a character.
Currently Following: Batman, Detective Comics, Dark Knight 3, Flash, Amazing Spider-Man, Multiversity, Spider-Man, X-Men
BRING BACK THE OLD WOLVERINE!!!
I think that's the idea behind "the illusion of change" that allows comics to go on never ending narratives forever with characters being in more or less the same place throughout. I think one of the problems for OMD is that it was so forced, regressing and retconny that it kinda threw wrench into that illusion for many people, if that makes sense. At least that's how I kinda felt about it.
Last edited by FishyZombie; 04-16-2017 at 12:24 AM.
Currently Following: Batman, Detective Comics, Dark Knight 3, Flash, Amazing Spider-Man, Multiversity, Spider-Man, X-Men
BRING BACK THE OLD WOLVERINE!!!