Live action Titans TV show

[Frontier]

Was it ever explained? Because Idk how one looks at an archer and says "Speedy!"

He's quick on the draw?

[CosmiComic]

He's quick on the draw?

He'd have to be to justify using a bow after 1600 AD.

[Frontier]

He'd have to be to justify using a bow after 1600 AD.

Some things are always cool (depending on who you ask) .

[Jackalope89]

He'd have to be to justify using a bow after 1600 AD.

*looks at the Native Americans*

[CosmiComic]

Some things are always cool (depending on who you ask) .

Not to me. "Looking cool" means actually looking smart. Not taking the extra time to draw you string

*looks at the Native Americans*

They used guns, too, though. And by the 40s, nobody was using them. IMO it's just a "we think it's cool so let's keep it even though it makes no sense"

[Frontier]

Not to me. "Looking cool" means actually looking smart. Not taking the extra time to draw you string

They used guns, too, though. And by the 40s, nobody was using them. IMO it's just a "we think it's cool so let's keep it even though it makes no sense"

(Shrug) Green Arrow makes it look cool.

[Metro]

He'd have to be to justify using a bow after 1600 AD.

Not to me. "Looking cool" means actually looking smart. Not taking the extra time to draw you string



They used guns, too, though. And by the 40s, nobody was using them. IMO it's just a "we think it's cool so let's keep it even though it makes no sense"

By this point you're complaining about the core concept of the character

[CosmiComic]

(Shrug) Green Arrow makes it look cool.

Is this the CW? Do they even have the budget for good choreography?

And none of that changes my argument? He's doing exactly what I said was the problem. It only works on an isolated island where he has no other option

By this point you're complaining about the core concept of the character

Um, yeah, that is what I'm doing.

[Metro]

Is this the CW? Do they even have the budget for good choreography?

And none of that changes my argument? He's doing exactly what I said was the problem. It only works on an isolated island where he has no other option



Um, yeah, that is what I'm doing.

Yeah, and it's pointless.
If you don't like the concept then move on, there's no point in complaining about it.

[CosmiComic]

Yeah, and it's pointless.
If you don't like the concept then move on, there's no point in complaining about it.

It's not like I'm saying DC should get rid of the characters. But that doesn't mean I think it's not a little stupid.

[Frontier]

Is this the CW? Do they even have the budget for good choreography?

And none of that changes my argument? He's doing exactly what I said was the problem. It only works on an isolated island where he has no other option

Arrow had pretty good fight choreography.

Most of the clips aren't from the island?

[Jokerz79]

He'd have to be to justify using a bow after 1600 AD.

Well when you're a superhero usually you have a no kill policy unless you're a vigilante or anti-hero and thus not a superhero.

& Arrows are less deadly than Bullets.

[Metro]

It's not like I'm saying DC should get rid of the characters. But that doesn't mean I think it's not a little stupid.

And?
It's a fictional character, it doesn't need to be realistic

[j9ac9k]

It's not like I'm saying DC should get rid of the characters. But that doesn't mean I think it's not a little stupid.

Any more stupid than a Batarang? Or a colorful costume? No hero is immune from some kind of "stupid" theatrical presentation that's part of the fantasy of superheroes. That's why a lot of people used to think comics were stupid in the first place.

[CosmiComic]

Arrow had pretty good fight choreography.

Most of the clips aren't from the island?

Ok. I quit watching it a while ago.

Well when you're a superhero usually you have a no kill policy unless you're a vigilante or anti-hero and thus not a superhero.

& Arrows are less deadly than Bullets.

Doesn't he use a bunch of trick arrows with lethal potential?

And?
It's a fictional character, it doesn't need to be realistic

Um, that's not quite true.

Any more stupid than a Batarang? Or a colorful costume? No hero is immune from some kind of "stupid" theatrical presentation that's part of the fantasy of superheroes. That's why a lot of people used to think comics were stupid in the first place.

While you have a point, Batman isn't trying to replace a gun. He's trying to take in people non-violently, and he's using a fictional weapon which can do that. Green Arrow is using a real, obsolete weapon to shoot projectiles, while Batman can rapidly throw batarangs.