Looking for specific male sexualization in comics (Read everything, please)

[dancj]

Don't lie. I've been checking through the entirety of Saga - it appears NOWHERE there.

Don't be rude.

I didn't lie - I said probably.

It has normalised gay males and it has intentionally sexy male nudity.

The only think it possibly lacks is a man's bum exposed in a sexy outfit, but I only say possibly, because I expect that's there if you look hard enough.

but mainly, don't be rude.

[ed2962]

The irony is that as more people have been including LGBT representation in comics, the creators who are doing it are being careful not to be exploitative. The type of specific images that the OP is looking exist but not coming out of mainstream companies that are trying to be non-offensive.

[KurvosVicky]

Don't be rude.

I didn't lie - I said probably.

It has normalised gay males and it has intentionally sexy male nudity.

The only think it possibly lacks is a man's bum exposed in a sexy outfit, but I only say possibly, because I expect that's there if you look hard enough.

but mainly, don't be rude.

It has two ugly nerdy fish dudes as gays with very unflattering bodies. Meanwhile, the two main characters are a supersexy heterosexual couple. Double standards much? Also, plenty and PLENTY of sexy female butts in there. Not even ONE sexy male butt. Clearly, it's drawn by a heterosexual dude who doesn't like drawing gay stuff unless he's forced to.

[Jackmando7]

It has two ugly nerdy fish dudes as gays with very unflattering bodies. Meanwhile, the two main characters are a supersexy heterosexual couple. Double standards much? Also, plenty and PLENTY of sexy female butts in there. Not even ONE sexy male butt. Clearly, it's drawn by a heterosexual dude who doesn't like drawing gay stuff unless he's forced to.

It's drawn by a female, tough guy.

[The Darknight Detective]

It's drawn by a female, tough guy.

Which suggests it's more to do with the demands of the market than the personal preferences of the creators themselves.

[Bor]

It has two ugly nerdy fish dudes as gays with very unflattering bodies. Meanwhile, the two main characters are a supersexy heterosexual couple. Double standards much? Also, plenty and PLENTY of sexy female butts in there. Not even ONE sexy male butt. Clearly, it's drawn by a heterosexual dude who doesn't like drawing gay stuff unless he's forced to.

Eh no it isnt. The artist is female. Thats not exactly a secret. Also you really ignored the whole "dont be rude" request.

[KOSLOX]

As I said in the other thread:

"#### it. Do your own research."

[Kirby101]

What about these guys?

[KurvosVicky]

Eh no it isnt. The artist is female. Thats not exactly a secret. Also you really ignored the whole "dont be rude" request.

It's still two ugly nerdy fish dudes.

[KurvosVicky]

What about these guys?

Not a comic. And that's clearly meant for comedy and not sexualization. And no skin revealed.

[Bor]

It's still two ugly nerdy fish dudes.

How does that make your generalzation regarding this specific artist any more right?

[Spike-X]

If you know it doesn't fully fit my criterias, why are you commenting? I specifically said it HAS to fit all my criterias.

You're rude and demanding. Go away.

[Spike-X]

Also, 'criteria' is already plural. It doesn't need an 's' at the end.

[Goggindowner]

Why is this thread still open? This whole thing is a circle jerk of "Here's an honest attempt at being helpful" met with "Ew LITERALLY not that DIDN'T YOU READ MY DEMANDS??"

F' this.

[ed2962]

Despite the OP's exacting standards, I think people should still post stuff. Even if he doesn't like the images, I think other people might find them interesting or intriguing.