Originally Posted by
kilderkin
Firstly I picked it up coz I love scott and the new gods
When it started I quite liked what I had seen of king, that's not the case now not just for this book
If this is a study of his mind set that does not require an ending where we as readers are not really any further down the path than at the start, there are many points left unclear, and whilst that may be ok with you it's not for me, it's ok that we don't agree on that
it frustrates me because this was 12 issues of what effectively ends on a nonsense ending with no real clarity or conclusions, and I don't like that, I hoped for better
and in fairness, I hoped it woukd be better than this, as I felt it started well and hoped it would end as such, whilst it was unclear along the way, there was more than enough time to come to a definitive conclusion
the writer didn't want to, Ok, I reserve the right not to like that and to say so
It's not wrong that he wrote this, just as it's not wrong that I, as a consumer gave it the full try and supported an alternative story
you know, like a fan of the character and compony might do
Have I enjoyed part of it, the first half or so sure
the conclusion not at all
if you did, good for you I'm glad, I'm also ok saying I didn't
Lesson learned for me is skip tom king from now on, why I haven't looked at the current crisis book
and my point about the opus was a simple one, and neither of us are in charge of creative so that's all cool too