Now I don't think Marvel/MCU have made a bad film now there have been some mediocre ones but none I'd call bad. Now Raimi made two Masterpieces IMO with Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2, 3 isn't awful to me you can see where the studio messed it up and Amazing Spider-Man was good to me, Amazing Spider-Man 2 was a mess IMO. Now I don't care if Sony or let's say Universal with their Dark Universe I'm starting to think these Studios need to watch 2008 Iron Man if they want to start a cinematic universe Marvel seemed so restrained now they had one Shield Agent Coulson who at the time was a comic character he was a random agent and a end credit scene promising a possible bigger universe. Even Hulk released that same hear some mentions of a 40's Super-Soldier program and after credits scene of Tony. This throwing everything including the kitchen sink never works I get they want that Marvel/Disney Money but they'll get it if they take their time...
Michelle Williams negotiating for a part
http://variety.com/2017/film/news/mi...dy-1202564136/
Surprised no one's posted this, considering we're talking about Tom Hardy and Venom, but some YouTubers did an interesting crossover that pits Hardy's two geek roles (not counting his turn as Shinzon on Star Trek: together
This film seems to be punching above its weight in casting.
Sincerely,
Thomas Mets
Apparently the movie will be based around Lethal Protector and Planet of the Symbiotes, so we might get other symbiotes like Scream and Riot. Also, I wonder if Sony is still open to connecting the Venom film to Life:
https://www.cbr.com/comic-venom-movie-based-on/
"I should describe my known nature as tripartite, my interests consisting of three parallel and disassociated groups; a) love of the strange and the fantastic, b) love of abstract truth and scientific logic, c) love of the ancient and the permanent. Sundry combinations of these strains will probably account for my...odd tastes, and eccentricities."
This is really the best way to go for this film in terms of;...
a) Minimal Spider-Man presence required, hopefully just a flashback of Eddie and Spidey's 'deal', also Tom Holland not required.
b) Which means the film can maintain the illusion / possibility that it's set in the MCU.
c) Shooting in SF is gonna be cheaper than NYC.
.....If we get the classic form hulking CGI Venom ripping heads off in an R rated film (w/ Tom Hardy!) well, that's like a Venom fanboys wet dream.
And from the looks of the McFarlane style promo art, we could be getting that!
Hardy is an incredible actor, but for Bane I felt he was too small for the role.
The great thing about Venom tho, is that he's is supposed to look like a big CGI thing so Hardy's height should not be a problem.
Really hyped for this film, Hardy does not except crap roles so his inclusion and that of people like Michelle Williams is very promising.
Hardy's in, I'm in. There is nothing he has done yet that I didn't find to be at least entertaining.
Every day is a gift, not a given right.
I hope for no Spider-Man at all in this. At minimum, you run the risk of having him cameo and then thanklessly marginalized, since this isn't "his" movie, obviously. I also have zero interest in Brock's traditional hatred of Spider-Man and antagonizing of him, but then expecting fan sympathy when he goes up against "bad guys" himself. No. Flat-out. I'm not supporting that.
I'm also not interested in trying to microwave a relationship between Peter and the symbiote. Better to just completely bypass at this point.
Michelle Williams confirms that she's Anne
https://screenrant.com/michelle-will...m-anne-weying/