Results 1 to 15 of 64

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Spectacular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    240

    Default Batman Knightfall Review (Canon Read Through #39)

    My Indepth review of Batman Knightfall.

    A story in which Bane breaks Batmans back and we see the end of Bruce Wayne for a LONG period in the comics.

    Does the book still hold up? Check out my review below to find out!

    Batman Knightfall Review

    Cheers
    Check Out My Batman Canon Read Through And Review Here, From Year One all the way to Rebirth

    Batman Canon Read Through And Review

    I'm Also On Patreon. This all goes towards buying new graphic novels so if you like my reviews please pledge whatever you can. Thank you.

    Deffinition Patreon

  2. #2
    Knows some stuff thefiresky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    456

    Default

    This book is 24 years old.
    Last edited by thefiresky; 06-26-2017 at 07:01 AM.
    Pulling:
    Batman, Detective Comics, The Sentry, Mister Miracle, Venom

  3. #3
    Spectacular Member AzraelOnline's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Fort Lauderdale, FL
    Posts
    128

    Default

    Yea, I don't see why doing a review of a story arc from the mid-90's is relevant. It's especially difficult to read reviews or after thoughts so many years later by the writers here at CBR who do nothing but pick at the art and arc, putting their 'opinion' that characters were hated at the time when they weren't and feeling that newer stories are superior. There really is no writer who can stand up to what Dennis O'Neil did in his time.
    Also, just because Bane is used in one of he popular Nolan films (which is an abortion) doesn't mean it should be referenced here, same with John Blake who has absolutely nothing to do with this arc, just a character Nolan made up. As for the identity, like with the Joker that's something that means less to Bane because it's about beating him, the hunt. Not exposing.
    Knightfall was the first big cross title story arc that DC did of this nature, and it was one he said they didn't want to do again...but then they did No Man's Land which was really more of a mess. In regards to your comment of not recommending sitting down and reading such a large arc at once - neither did readers when this was happening, it was pretty much released one part a week, which made it easier to digest. O'Neil and company scripted this all out meticulously and made sure that there weren't any errors.
    Azrael Online - The Source for all things Azrael

  4. #4
    Spectacular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    240

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AzraelOnline View Post
    Yea, I don't see why doing a review of a story arc from the mid-90's is relevant. It's especially difficult to read reviews or after thoughts so many years later by the writers here at CBR who do nothing but pick at the art and arc, putting their 'opinion' that characters were hated at the time when they weren't and feeling that newer stories are superior. There really is no writer who can stand up to what Dennis O'Neil did in his time.
    Also, just because Bane is used in one of he popular Nolan films (which is an abortion) doesn't mean it should be referenced here, same with John Blake who has absolutely nothing to do with this arc, just a character Nolan made up. As for the identity, like with the Joker that's something that means less to Bane because it's about beating him, the hunt. Not exposing.
    Knightfall was the first big cross title story arc that DC did of this nature, and it was one he said they didn't want to do again...but then they did No Man's Land which was really more of a mess. In regards to your comment of not recommending sitting down and reading such a large arc at once - neither did readers when this was happening, it was pretty much released one part a week, which made it easier to digest. O'Neil and company scripted this all out meticulously and made sure that there weren't any errors.
    1. Because I'm doing a read through of Batman Graphic Novels
    2. Bane should be mentioned here because this is the source material in which the movie was based on, I mentioned John Blake due to the similarity of how they discovered Bruce Wayne Was Batman
    3. I cant travel back in time and read such a large arc week by week, it is collected now so I would not recommend reading it in one go
    Check Out My Batman Canon Read Through And Review Here, From Year One all the way to Rebirth

    Batman Canon Read Through And Review

    I'm Also On Patreon. This all goes towards buying new graphic novels so if you like my reviews please pledge whatever you can. Thank you.

    Deffinition Patreon

  5. #5
    Incredible Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    England
    Posts
    570

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AzraelOnline View Post
    Yea, I don't see why doing a review of a story arc from the mid-90's is relevant. It's especially difficult to read reviews or after thoughts so many years later by the writers here at CBR who do nothing but pick at the art and arc, putting their 'opinion' that characters were hated at the time when they weren't and feeling that newer stories are superior. There really is no writer who can stand up to what Dennis O'Neil did in his time.
    Also, just because Bane is used in one of he popular Nolan films (which is an abortion) doesn't mean it should be referenced here, same with John Blake who has absolutely nothing to do with this arc, just a character Nolan made up. As for the identity, like with the Joker that's something that means less to Bane because it's about beating him, the hunt. Not exposing.
    Knightfall was the first big cross title story arc that DC did of this nature, and it was one he said they didn't want to do again...but then they did No Man's Land which was really more of a mess. In regards to your comment of not recommending sitting down and reading such a large arc at once - neither did readers when this was happening, it was pretty much released one part a week, which made it easier to digest. O'Neil and company scripted this all out meticulously and made sure that there weren't any errors.
    I don't know about you, but I enjoyed the review.

  6. #6
    Mighty Member Darkseid Is's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    1,131

    Default

    I like Knightfall. It was one of the first series of books I read when I got into comics back in the early to mid 2000s. I could never find the trade (if one even existed back then) so I would go and hunt for the individual issues at comic stores and cons. So much fun.

    I always thought Bane was really interesting but I thought his motivations were kind of weak. Why was it so important to him to defeat Batman? Because he had a dream about fighting a bat? Vengence of Bane II is fun if you ever get around to reading that one.

  7. #7
    Not a Newbie Member JBatmanFan05's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Arkham, Mass (lol no)
    Posts
    9,207

    Default

    Unlike the Spidey 90s Clone saga, the Knightfall saga and Death of Superman saga are fun reads. They're long, but not mindnumbingly long.

    My custom binds (which the new and coming Omnibi will mostly end up matching) of Knightfall are just such a full fun super serial comic reading experience. Different writers and artists, all telling one long story. And it was headline material, the main stuff in Batman's world and life. Not like today with mostly inconsequential meh Eternals with lesser talents.

    Knightfall was like if Tom King and Scott Snyder and Tim Seeley and artists like Janin and Finch and Romita and Jock and etc did a years long numbered Batman event. And when I think of how fun such serial events were in retrospect, especially compared to what we read nowadays, I wish we might see a couple more long serial main events like that.

    But Knightfall was Wrestlemania fun, Die Hard fun. Lots of action, lots of characters, good characterization. Azrael vs Bane was an extraordinary battle, one of the best ones in comics just for how long it was and the dramatic hype for it. All of the Batman rogues were in top form. Dixon and Moench and Denny and Alan Grant were a dream team in retrospect, such talented veteran comic talent.
    Things I love: Batman, Superman, AEW, old films, Lovecraft

    Grant Morrison: “Adults...struggle desperately with fiction, demanding constantly that it conform to the rules of everyday life. Adults foolishly demand to know how Superman can possibly fly, or how Batman can possibly run a multibillion-dollar business empire during the day and fight crime at night, when the answer is obvious even to the smallest child: because it's not real.”

  8. #8
    BANNED
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    4,400

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thefiresky View Post
    This book is 24 years old.
    So are most of the best Batman stories tbh, a true classic will be getting reviewed every now and then, no foul.

  9. #9
    Incredible Member Adset's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    935

    Default

    i love these types of reviews. back before these forums reset there were a bunch of these on the classic comics forum.

    please continue!

  10. #10
    Incredible Member SicariiDC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Murda Mass
    Posts
    847

    Default

    Knightfall is what got me started in the ****. I started reading it again but got distracted
    "yeah, chum, the devil you say, bunkie" - claremont

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •